Skip to main content
Journal cover image

10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Larson, E; George, A; Morgan, R; Poteat, T
Published in: Health policy and planning
October 2016

Intersectionality has emerged as an important framework for understanding and responding to health inequities by making visible the fluid and interconnected structures of power that create them. It promotes an understanding of the dynamic nature of the privileges and disadvantages that permeate health systems and affect health. It considers the interaction of different social stratifiers (e.g. 'race'/ethnicity, indigeneity, gender, class, sexuality, geography, age, disability/ability, migration status, religion) and the power structures that underpin them at multiple levels. In doing so, it is a departure from previous health inequalities research that looked at these forms of social stratification in isolation from one another or in an additive manner. Despite its potential use and long history in other disciplines, intersectionality is uncommonly used in health systems research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To orient readers to intersectionality theory and research, we first define intersectionality and describe its role in public health, and then we review resources on intersectionality. We found that applications in public health mostly increased after 2009, with only 14 out of 86 articles focused on LMICs. To arrive at 10 best resources, we selected articles based on the proportion of the article that was devoted to intersectionality, the strength of the intersectionality analysis, and its relevance to LMICs. The first four resources explain intersectionality as a methodology. The subsequent six articles apply intersectionality to research in LMIC with quantitative and qualitative analysis. We provide examples from India, Swaziland, Uganda and Mexico. Topics for the studies range from HIV, violence and sexual abuse to immunization and the use of health entitlements. Through these 10 resources, we hope to spark interest and open a needed conversation on the importance and use of intersectional analysis in LMICs as part of understanding people-centred health systems.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Health policy and planning

DOI

EISSN

1460-2237

ISSN

0268-1080

Publication Date

October 2016

Volume

31

Issue

8

Start / End Page

964 / 969

Related Subject Headings

  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Public Health
  • Poverty
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Humans
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Health Resources
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Global Health
  • Ethnicity
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Larson, E., George, A., Morgan, R., & Poteat, T. (2016). 10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy and Planning, 31(8), 964–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw020
Larson, Elizabeth, Asha George, Rosemary Morgan, and Tonia Poteat. “10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries.Health Policy and Planning 31, no. 8 (October 2016): 964–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw020.
Larson E, George A, Morgan R, Poteat T. 10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. Health policy and planning. 2016 Oct;31(8):964–9.
Larson, Elizabeth, et al. “10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries.Health Policy and Planning, vol. 31, no. 8, Oct. 2016, pp. 964–69. Epmc, doi:10.1093/heapol/czw020.
Larson E, George A, Morgan R, Poteat T. 10 Best resources on… intersectionality with an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries. Health policy and planning. 2016 Oct;31(8):964–969.
Journal cover image

Published In

Health policy and planning

DOI

EISSN

1460-2237

ISSN

0268-1080

Publication Date

October 2016

Volume

31

Issue

8

Start / End Page

964 / 969

Related Subject Headings

  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Public Health
  • Poverty
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Humans
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Health Resources
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Global Health
  • Ethnicity