Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: A meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wu, LM; Hu, JN; Hua, J; Liu, MJ; Chen, J; Xu, JR
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia
January 1, 2012

Background and Aim: To obtain diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of pancreatic malignancy. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of all available studies of the diagnostic performance of DWI and PET/CT for pancreatic malignancy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and some other databases were searched for initial studies. We determined sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) using hierarchical regression models. Results: Across 16 studies with 804 patients, PET/CT sensitivity was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82, 0.81) and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.91). Overall, LR+ was 5.84 (95% CI, 4.59, 7.42) and LR- was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.17, 0.33). DWI sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74, 0.92) and specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.98). LR+ was 9.53 (95% CI, 2.41, 37.65) and LR- was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.09, 0.32). In subgroup analysis, the sensitivity of enhanced versus unenhanced PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic cancer was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86, 0.96) versus 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.90) (P>0.05), the specificity 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73, 1.00) versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69, 0.94) (P>0.05). Conclusion: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was highly sensitive and DWI was a highly specific modality in diagnosing patients with pancreatic malignancy. PET/CT and DWI could play different roles in diagnosing pancreatic carcinoma. Enhanced PET/CT seems to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT. Further larger prospective studies are needed to establish its value for diagnosis in pancreatic cancer. © 2012 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia

DOI

EISSN

1440-1746

ISSN

0815-9319

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Volume

27

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1027 / 1035

Related Subject Headings

  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wu, L. M., Hu, J. N., Hua, J., Liu, M. J., Chen, J., & Xu, J. R. (2012). Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: A meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia, 27(6), 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07112.x
Wu, L. M., J. N. Hu, J. Hua, M. J. Liu, J. Chen, and J. R. Xu. “Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: A meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model.” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia 27, no. 6 (January 1, 2012): 1027–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07112.x.
Wu, L. M., et al. “Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: A meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model.” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia, vol. 27, no. 6, Jan. 2012, pp. 1027–35. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07112.x.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Australia

DOI

EISSN

1440-1746

ISSN

0815-9319

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Volume

27

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1027 / 1035

Related Subject Headings

  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences