Life Cycle Impact and Benefit Trade-Offs of a Produced Water and Abandoned Mine Drainage Cotreatment Process.

A cotreatment process for produced water and abandoned mine drainage (AMD) has been established and demonstrated at the pilot-scale. The present study evaluates the potential of the proposed process to aid in management of two high volume wastewater resources in Pennsylvania. A systems-level approach is established to evaluate the primary trade-offs, including cotreatment process environmental impacts, transportation impacts, and environmental benefits realized from precluding direct AMD release to the environment. Life cycle impact assessment was used to quantify the environmental and human health impacts as well as to identify "hot spots" of the cotreatment process. Electricity use was found to be the dominant contributor to all impact categories. Extending the system boundary to include transportation of the two wastewaters to a to-be-determined cotreatment site revealed the important impact of transportation. An optimization approach was employed (using the region of Southwest Pennsylvania) to evaluate minimization of transportation distance considering the location and number of treatment sites. Finally, a quantitative analysis of environmental benefits realized by precluding direct AMD release to the environment was performed. The results suggest that the magnitude of benefit realized in treating a highly polluted AMD is greater than the magnitude of impacts from the cotreatment process.

Duke Scholars

Author Leanne Gilbertson Civil and Environmental Engineering