Respiratory-Correlated 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Liver Cancer Radiation Therapy Motion Management.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a respiratory-correlated (RC) 4-dimensional (4D) imaging technique based on magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) (RC-4DMRF) for liver tumor motion management in radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen patients with liver cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. k-space MRF signals of the liver were acquired during free-breathing using the fast acquisition with steady-state precession sequence on a 3T scanner. The signals were binned into 8 respiratory phases based on respiratory surrogates, and interphase displacement vector fields were estimated using a phase-specific low-rank optimization method. Hereafter, the tissue property maps, including T1 and T2 relaxation times, and proton density, were reconstructed using a pyramid motion-compensated method that alternatively optimized interphase displacement vector fields and subspace images. To evaluate the efficacy of RC-4DMRF, amplitude motion differences and Pearson correlation coefficients were determined to assess measurement agreement in tumor motion between RC-4DMRF and cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); mean absolute percentage errors of the RC-4DMRF-derived tissue maps were calculated to reveal tissue quantification accuracy using digital human phantom; and tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio of RC-4DMRF images was compared with that of planning CT and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) images. A paired Student t test was used for statistical significance analysis with a P value threshold of .05. RESULTS: RC-4DMRF achieved excellent agreement in motion measurement with cine MRI, yielding the mean (± standard deviation) Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.95 ± 0.05 and 0.93 ± 0.09 and amplitude motion differences of 1.48 ± 1.06 mm and 0.81 ± 0.64 mm in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Moreover, RC-4DMRF achieved high accuracy in tissue property quantification, with mean absolute percentage errors of 8.8%, 9.6%, and 5.0% for T1, T2, and proton density, respectively. Notably, the tumor contrast-to-noise ratio in RC-4DMRI-derived T1 maps (6.41 ± 3.37) was found to be the highest among all tissue property maps, approximately equal to that of CE-MRI (6.96 ± 1.01, P = .862), and substantially higher than that of planning CT (2.91 ± 1.97, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: RC-4DMRF demonstrated high accuracy in respiratory motion measurement and tissue properties quantification, potentially facilitating tumor motion management in liver radiation therapy.

Duke Scholars

Author Jing Cai Radiation Oncology