Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fudim, M; Dalgaard, F; Friedman, DJ; Abraham, WT; Cleland, JGF; Curtis, AB; Gold, MR; Kutyifa, V; Linde, C; Ali-Ahmed, F; Tang, A; Inoue, LYT ...
Published in: Eur J Heart Fail
April 2024

AIMS: Patients with heart failure usually have several other medical conditions that might alter the effects of interventions. We investigated whether the burden of comorbidity modified the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Original patient-level data from eight randomized trials exploring the effects of CRT versus no CRT were pooled (BLOCK-HF, MIRACLE, MIRACLE-ICD, MIRACLE-ICD II, RAFT, COMPANION, MADIT-CRT and REVERSE). A prior history of the following comorbidities was considered: episodic or persistent atrial fibrillation (n = 920), coronary artery disease (n = 3732), diabetes (n = 2171), and hypertension (n = 3353). Patients were classified into three groups based on the number of comorbidities: 0, 1-2, or ≥3. The outcomes of interest were time to all-cause mortality and time to the composite outcome of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or all-cause mortality. Outcomes were evaluated within each comorbidity group using a Bayesian hierarchical Weibull survival regression model. Of 6324 patients, 970 (15%) had no comorbidities, 4052 (64%) had 1-2 and 1302 (21%) had ≥3 comorbidities. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for CRT versus no CRT for all-cause mortality in the overall cohort was 0.79 (95% credible interval [CI] 0.68-0.93) (p = 0.010); for no comorbidities the aHR was 0.54 (95% CI 0.34-0.86), for 1-2 comorbidities was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.97) and for ≥3 comorbidities was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.07) (no significant interaction between CRT and comorbidity burden: p = 0.13). For the endpoint of HFH or all-cause mortality, the aHR for the overall cohort was 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.84) (p = 0.001), for no comorbidities was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.94), for 1-2 comorbidities was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.90) and for ≥3 comorbidities was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55-0.82) (no significant interaction between CRT and comorbidity burden: p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: In a meta-analysis of patient-level data from eight major trials, the totality of evidence suggests that CRT reduces HFH and/or all-cause mortality even when several comorbid diseases are present. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00271154, NCT00251251, NCT00267098, NCT00180271.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Eur J Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1879-0844

Publication Date

April 2024

Volume

26

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1039 / 1046

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Female
  • Comorbidity
  • Cause of Death
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fudim, M., Dalgaard, F., Friedman, D. J., Abraham, W. T., Cleland, J. G. F., Curtis, A. B., … Sanders, G. D. (2024). Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials. Eur J Heart Fail, 26(4), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3029
Fudim, Marat, Frederik Dalgaard, Daniel J. Friedman, William T. Abraham, John G. F. Cleland, Anne B. Curtis, Michael R. Gold, et al. “Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials.Eur J Heart Fail 26, no. 4 (April 2024): 1039–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3029.
Fudim M, Dalgaard F, Friedman DJ, Abraham WT, Cleland JGF, Curtis AB, et al. Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;26(4):1039–46.
Fudim, Marat, et al. “Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials.Eur J Heart Fail, vol. 26, no. 4, Apr. 2024, pp. 1039–46. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ejhf.3029.
Fudim M, Dalgaard F, Friedman DJ, Abraham WT, Cleland JGF, Curtis AB, Gold MR, Kutyifa V, Linde C, Ali-Ahmed F, Tang A, Olivas-Martinez A, Inoue LYT, Al-Khatib SM, Sanders GD. Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;26(4):1039–1046.
Journal cover image

Published In

Eur J Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1879-0844

Publication Date

April 2024

Volume

26

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1039 / 1046

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart Failure
  • Female
  • Comorbidity
  • Cause of Death
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy