Skip to main content

Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pattharanitima, P; Thongprayoon, C; Kaewput, W; Qureshi, F; Qureshi, F; Petnak, T; Srivali, N; Gembillo, G; O'Corragain, OA; Chesdachai, S ...
Published in: J Clin Med
October 28, 2021

BACKGROUND: Lactic acidosis is the most common cause of anion gap metabolic acidosis in the intensive care unit (ICU), associated with poor outcomes including mortality. We sought to compare machine learning (ML) approaches versus logistic regression analysis for prediction of mortality in lactic acidosis patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database to identify ICU adult patients with lactic acidosis (serum lactate ≥4 mmol/L). The outcome of interest was hospital mortality. We developed prediction models using four ML approaches consisting of random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), artificial neural network (ANN), and statistical modeling with forward stepwise logistic regression using the testing dataset. We then assessed model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, error rate, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), F1 score, and assessed model calibration using the Brier score, in the independent testing dataset. RESULTS: Of 1919 lactic acidosis ICU patients, 1535 and 384 were included in the training and testing dataset, respectively. Hospital mortality was 30%. RF had the highest AUROC at 0.83, followed by logistic regression 0.81, XGBoost 0.81, ANN 0.79, and DT 0.71. In addition, RF also had the highest accuracy (0.79), MCC (0.45), F1 score (0.56), and lowest error rate (21.4%). The RF model was the most well-calibrated. The Brier score for RF, DT, XGBoost, ANN, and multivariable logistic regression was 0.15, 0.19, 0.18, 0.19, and 0.16, respectively. The RF model outperformed multivariable logistic regression model, SOFA score (AUROC 0.74), SAP II score (AUROC 0.77), and Charlson score (AUROC 0.69). CONCLUSION: The ML prediction model using RF algorithm provided the highest predictive performance for hospital mortality among ICU patient with lactic acidosis.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

October 28, 2021

Volume

10

Issue

21

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pattharanitima, P., Thongprayoon, C., Kaewput, W., Qureshi, F., Petnak, T., Srivali, N., … Cheungpasitporn, W. (2021). Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis. J Clin Med, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215021
Pattharanitima, Pattharawin, Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Kaewput, Fawad Qureshi, Fahad Qureshi, Tananchai Petnak, Narat Srivali, et al. “Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis.J Clin Med 10, no. 21 (October 28, 2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215021.
Pattharanitima P, Thongprayoon C, Kaewput W, Qureshi F, Petnak T, Srivali N, et al. Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21).
Pattharanitima, Pattharawin, et al. “Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis.J Clin Med, vol. 10, no. 21, Oct. 2021. Pubmed, doi:10.3390/jcm10215021.
Pattharanitima P, Thongprayoon C, Kaewput W, Qureshi F, Petnak T, Srivali N, Gembillo G, O’Corragain OA, Chesdachai S, Vallabhajosyula S, Guru PK, Mao MA, Garovic VD, Dillon JJ, Cheungpasitporn W. Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 28;10(21).

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

October 28, 2021

Volume

10

Issue

21

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences