Scholars@Duke
Journal cover image

Re: Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: Is it an Appropriate Term in Children?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Assimos, DG
Published in: J Urol
January 2016
Published version (DOI) Link to item

Duke Scholars

Dean George Assimos
Author Dean George Assimos Urology

Published In

J Urol

DOI

10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.009

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

January 2016

Volume

195

Issue

1

Start / End Page

170

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
  • Male
  • Lithotripsy
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Humans
  • Female
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Assimos, D. G. (2016). Re: Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: Is it an Appropriate Term in Children? J Urol, 195(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.009
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: Is it an Appropriate Term in Children?” J Urol 195, no. 1 (January 2016): 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.009.
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: Is it an Appropriate Term in Children?” J Urol, vol. 195, no. 1, Jan. 2016, p. 170. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.009.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

DOI

10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.009

EISSN

1527-3792

Publication Date

January 2016

Volume

195

Issue

1

Start / End Page

170

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
  • Male
  • Lithotripsy
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Humans
  • Female
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences