Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.
Publication
, Journal Article
Assimos, DG
Published in: J Urol
March 2015
Duke Scholars
Published In
J Urol
DOI
EISSN
1527-3792
Publication Date
March 2015
Volume
193
Issue
3
Start / End Page
899
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Urology & Nephrology
- Ultrasonography
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Nephrolithiasis
- Male
- Humans
- Female
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Assimos, D. G. (2015). Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. J Urol, 193(3), 899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.002
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.” J Urol 193, no. 3 (March 2015): 899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.002.
Assimos DG. Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):899.
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.” J Urol, vol. 193, no. 3, Mar. 2015, p. 899. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.002.
Assimos DG. Re: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):899.
Published In
J Urol
DOI
EISSN
1527-3792
Publication Date
March 2015
Volume
193
Issue
3
Start / End Page
899
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Urology & Nephrology
- Ultrasonography
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Nephrolithiasis
- Male
- Humans
- Female
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences