Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children?
Publication
, Journal Article
Assimos, DG
Published in: J Urol
February 2014
Duke Scholars
Published In
J Urol
DOI
EISSN
1527-3792
Publication Date
February 2014
Volume
191
Issue
2
Start / End Page
467
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Urology & Nephrology
- Male
- Lithotripsy
- Kidney Calculi
- Humans
- Female
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Assimos, D. G. (2014). Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Urol, 191(2), 467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.078
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children?” J Urol 191, no. 2 (February 2014): 467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.078.
Assimos DG. Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):467.
Assimos, Dean G. “Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children?” J Urol, vol. 191, no. 2, Feb. 2014, p. 467. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.078.
Assimos DG. Re: are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):467.
Published In
J Urol
DOI
EISSN
1527-3792
Publication Date
February 2014
Volume
191
Issue
2
Start / End Page
467
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Urology & Nephrology
- Male
- Lithotripsy
- Kidney Calculi
- Humans
- Female
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences