Skip to main content

Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Anastasio, AT; Mills, FB; Karavan, MP; Adams, SB
Published in: Foot Ankle Orthop
October 2023

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, such as ChatGPT, have become increasingly popular outlets for the consumption and distribution of health care-related advice. Because of a lack of regulation and oversight, the reliability of health care-related responses has become a topic of controversy in the medical community. To date, no study has explored the quality of AI-derived information as it relates to common foot and ankle pathologies. This study aims to assess the quality and educational benefit of ChatGPT responses to common foot and ankle-related questions. METHODS: ChatGPT was asked a series of 5 questions, including "What is the optimal treatment for ankle arthritis?" "How should I decide on ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis?" "Do I need surgery for Jones fracture?" "How can I prevent Charcot arthropathy?" and "Do I need to see a doctor for my ankle sprain?" Five responses (1 per each question) were included after applying the exclusion criteria. The content was graded using DISCERN (a well-validated informational analysis tool) and AIRM (a self-designed tool for exercise evaluation). RESULTS: Health care professionals graded the ChatGPT-generated responses as bottom tier 4.5% of the time, middle tier 27.3% of the time, and top tier 68.2% of the time. CONCLUSION: Although ChatGPT and other related AI platforms have become a popular means for medical information distribution, the educational value of the AI-generated responses related to foot and ankle pathologies was variable. With 4.5% of responses receiving a bottom-tier rating, 27.3% of responses receiving a middle-tier rating, and 68.2% of responses receiving a top-tier rating, health care professionals should be aware of the high viewership of variable-quality content easily accessible on ChatGPT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross sectional study.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Foot Ankle Orthop

DOI

EISSN

2473-0114

Publication Date

October 2023

Volume

8

Issue

4

Start / End Page

24730114231209919

Location

United States
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Anastasio, A. T., Mills, F. B., Karavan, M. P., & Adams, S. B. (2023). Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Orthop, 8(4), 24730114231209920. https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114231209919
Anastasio, Albert Thomas, Frederic Baker Mills, Mark P. Karavan, and Samuel B. Adams. “Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery.Foot Ankle Orthop 8, no. 4 (October 2023): 24730114231209920. https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114231209919.
Anastasio AT, Mills FB, Karavan MP, Adams SB. Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Oct;8(4):24730114231209920.
Anastasio, Albert Thomas, et al. “Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery.Foot Ankle Orthop, vol. 8, no. 4, Oct. 2023, p. 24730114231209920. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/24730114231209919.
Anastasio AT, Mills FB, Karavan MP, Adams SB. Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Oct;8(4):24730114231209920.

Published In

Foot Ankle Orthop

DOI

EISSN

2473-0114

Publication Date

October 2023

Volume

8

Issue

4

Start / End Page

24730114231209919

Location

United States