Kleber, T., Floyd, W., Pasli, M., Qazi, J. J., Huang, C. C., Leng, J. X., … Boyer, M. J. (2023). ChatGPT is an Unreliable Tool for Reviewing Radiation Oncology Literature. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS (Vol. 117, pp. E523–E523).

Kleber, T., W. Floyd, M. Pasli, J. J. Qazi, C. C. Huang, J. X. Leng, D. J. Carpenter, B. Ackerson, J. K. Salama, and M. J. Boyer. “ChatGPT is an Unreliable Tool for Reviewing Radiation Oncology Literature.” In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 117:E523–E523, 2023.

Kleber T, Floyd W, Pasli M, Qazi JJ, Huang CC, Leng JX, et al. ChatGPT is an Unreliable Tool for Reviewing Radiation Oncology Literature. In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS. 2023. p. E523–E523.

Kleber, T., et al. “ChatGPT is an Unreliable Tool for Reviewing Radiation Oncology Literature.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, vol. 117, no. 2, 2023, pp. E523–E523.

Kleber T, Floyd W, Pasli M, Qazi JJ, Huang CC, Leng JX, Carpenter DJ, Ackerson B, Salama JK, Boyer MJ. ChatGPT is an Unreliable Tool for Reviewing Radiation Oncology Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS. 2023. p. E523–E523.