Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Krughoff, K; Foreman, JR; Peterson, AC
Published in: Urology
January 2024

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and quantify changes in elastic properties and in vivo pressure characteristics of pressure regulating balloons (PRB) over time, we conducted an analysis of the mechanical characteristics of the PRB after removal from patients for revision surgery. METHODS: Pressure and elasticity characteristics of new and used 61-70 cm H2O PRBs were analyzed. Pressure-volume curves were generated using commercially available urodynamics equipment. PRB pressures were measured at a standard fill volume (23 cc). Elastance was calculated by the slope of the tangent line at the inflection point of the pressure-volume curve. Tests were repeated 5 times per PRB and intraclass correlations were used to gauge test-retest reliability. Regression models were used for continuous variables based on data distribution. RESULTS: Twenty-seven used PRBs were analyzed after excluding 3 for alternative pressure ratings and 2 for occult pinpoint leaks. Time from artificial urinary sphincter placement to removal ranged from 0.02-17.6 years (median 8.4, interquartile range (IQR) 5.7-10.0). The mean pressure of all extracted PRBs: 58.8 cm H=O (± 7.4), 17 (62.9%) below the standard operating range. Each year of use in-vivo was associated with 1.09 cm H2O pressure loss on linear regression (P <.01 CI -1.52 to -0.65). PRB pressures were not significantly different according to indication for removal (1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P = .11). Loss of elastance was non-linear, decreasing by 1.9% per year on Poisson regression (P <.01, CI -0.03 to -0.01). When accounting for PRB age, PRB pressure was independently associated with detrusor overactivity. CONCLUSION: In PRBs tested for pressure-volume characteristics, increasing PRB age was associated with decreased pressure and elasticity.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Urology

DOI

EISSN

1527-9995

Publication Date

January 2024

Volume

183

Start / End Page

244 / 249

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reoperation
  • Humans
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Krughoff, K., Foreman, J. R., & Peterson, A. C. (2024). Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon. Urology, 183, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.008
Krughoff, Kevin, Jordan R. Foreman, and Andrew C. Peterson. “Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon.Urology 183 (January 2024): 244–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.008.
Krughoff, Kevin, et al. “Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon.Urology, vol. 183, Jan. 2024, pp. 244–49. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.008.
Journal cover image

Published In

Urology

DOI

EISSN

1527-9995

Publication Date

January 2024

Volume

183

Start / End Page

244 / 249

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reoperation
  • Humans
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences