Skip to main content

POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES

Publication ,  Conference
Douglas, CM; Martz, TD; Steele, RC; Noble, DR; Emerson, BL; Lieuwen, TC
Published in: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
January 1, 2023

To limit climate change and promote energy security, there is widespread interest towards transitioning existing fossil fueled combustion systems to sustainable, alternative fuels such as hydrogen (H2) and ammonia (NH3) without negatively impacting air quality. However, quantifying the emission rate of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) is a nuanced process when comparing pollutant emissions across different fuels, as discussed in our paper GT2022-80971 presented last year. That study indicated that the standardized approach for measuring combustion emissions in terms of dry, oxygen-referenced volumetric concentrations (i.e. ppmvdr) inflates reported pollutant emissions by up to 40% for hydrogen combustion relative to natural gas. In this paper, we extend our prior analysis of these so-called “indirect effects” on emissions values to ammonia (NH3) and cracked ammonia (i.e., molecular hydrogen and nitrogen, 3H2 per N2) fuel blends. The results reveal that ppmvdr-based pollutant reporting approaches have a less prominent influence on emissions interpretations for molecular ammonia–methane blends than for hydrogen–methane blends. Nonetheless, we still find that ppmvdr reporting induces up to a 10% relative increase in apparent emissions when comparing 100% NH3 and 100% methane (CH4) fuels at an equal mass-per-work emission rate. Cracking the ammonia is shown to increase this relative bias up to 21% in comparison to a methane system. Further analysis shows how drying, dilution, thermodynamic, and performance effects each influence the relationship between ppmvdr and mass-per-work emissions across the spectrum of fuels and fuel blends. Following discussion of these findings, we conclude that quantifying combustion emissions using ppmvdr is generally inappropriate for emissions comparisons and advise the combustion community to shift towards robust mass-per-energy metrics when quantifying pollutant emissions.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2023

Volume

3A-2023
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Douglas, C. M., Martz, T. D., Steele, R. C., Noble, D. R., Emerson, B. L., & Lieuwen, T. C. (2023). POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo (Vol. 3A-2023). https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2023-102554
Douglas, C. M., T. D. Martz, R. C. Steele, D. R. Noble, B. L. Emerson, and T. C. Lieuwen. “POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES.” In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Vol. 3A-2023, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2023-102554.
Douglas CM, Martz TD, Steele RC, Noble DR, Emerson BL, Lieuwen TC. POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo. 2023.
Douglas, C. M., et al. “POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES.” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 3A-2023, 2023. Scopus, doi:10.1115/gt2023-102554.
Douglas CM, Martz TD, Steele RC, Noble DR, Emerson BL, Lieuwen TC. POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR AMMONIA-BLENDED FUELS IN GAS TURBINES. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo. 2023.

Published In

Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2023

Volume

3A-2023