Skip to main content

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mol, I; Hu, Y; LeBlanc, TW; Cappelleri, JC; Chu, H; Nador, G; Aydin, D; Schepart, A; Hlavacek, P
Published in: Leuk Lymphoma
May 2024

For patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE/RMM), where effective treatments options are limited, B-cell maturation antigen and CD3-directed bispecific antibodies offer a promising new approach. Teclistamab gained conditional approval in Europe and accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval based on the MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181). Elranatamab, approved by the FDA demonstrated its safety and efficacy in the MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359). Given the absence of head-to-head trials, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess their relative efficacy. Key baseline characteristics were adjusted to be comparable between the two trials. In the MAIC, elranatamab demonstrated significantly better objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) than teclistamab, and numerically better complete response, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). These results suggest that elranatamab is an efficacious option for treating patients with TCE/R MM.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Leuk Lymphoma

DOI

EISSN

1029-2403

Publication Date

May 2024

Volume

65

Issue

5

Start / End Page

660 / 668

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • B-Cell Maturation Antigen
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mol, I., Hu, Y., LeBlanc, T. W., Cappelleri, J. C., Chu, H., Nador, G., … Hlavacek, P. (2024). A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma, 65(5), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2313628
Mol, Isha, Yannan Hu, Thomas W. LeBlanc, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Haitao Chu, Guido Nador, Didem Aydin, Alex Schepart, and Patrick Hlavacek. “A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma.Leuk Lymphoma 65, no. 5 (May 2024): 660–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2313628.
Mol, Isha, et al. “A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma.Leuk Lymphoma, vol. 65, no. 5, May 2024, pp. 660–68. Pubmed, doi:10.1080/10428194.2024.2313628.
Mol I, Hu Y, LeBlanc TW, Cappelleri JC, Chu H, Nador G, Aydin D, Schepart A, Hlavacek P. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2024 May;65(5):660–668.

Published In

Leuk Lymphoma

DOI

EISSN

1029-2403

Publication Date

May 2024

Volume

65

Issue

5

Start / End Page

660 / 668

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Immunology
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • B-Cell Maturation Antigen
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized