Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wang, S; Wang, C; Passias, PG; Li, G; Yan, M; Zhou, H
Published in: Eur Spine J
September 2009

CMA values have been effectively used to evaluate the amount of BI, the brainstem and medulla compression, and the amount of postoperative decompression. However, the reliability and reproducibility of this measurement have yet to be determined. In addition, the information that is available concerning CMA values in normal individuals has been limited to small series of patients. We recruited 200 patients that underwent MR imaging of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) for unrelated reasons. None of the patients had evidence of abnormalities at the CVJ. Two senior spine surgeons then measured the CMAs of these patients in a blind manner on three separate occasions. The CMA values ranged from 139.0 degrees to 175.5 degrees , with an average value of 158.46 degrees , and a 95% confidence interval from 144.8 degrees to 172.1 degrees . Overall, the CMA had excellent intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability. The CMA also had excellent intraobserver repeatability based on both the age and gender of the patients (P = 0.87 and 0.93, respectively). At the same time, the CMA also demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability based on gender (P = 0.97), while good interobserver reliability based on patients age (P = 0.23). No significant correlation between the actual CMA values and the patients' gender (P = 0.17), age (P = 0.058), or spin-echo series used (P = 0.342). This study demonstrated that CMA values obtained from midsagittal T1 MR images were a highly reliable and repeatable measurement. The data reported in this study can be used as baseline parameters for normal individuals.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Eur Spine J

DOI

EISSN

1432-0932

Publication Date

September 2009

Volume

18

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1349 / 1354

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Spinal Cord
  • Spinal Canal
  • Sex Factors
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Orthopedics
  • Occipital Bone
  • Observer Variation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wang, S., Wang, C., Passias, P. G., Li, G., Yan, M., & Zhou, H. (2009). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population. Eur Spine J, 18(9), 1349–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1112-8
Wang, Shenglin, Chao Wang, Peter G. Passias, Gang Li, Ming Yan, and Haitao Zhou. “Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population.Eur Spine J 18, no. 9 (September 2009): 1349–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1112-8.
Wang S, Wang C, Passias PG, Li G, Yan M, Zhou H. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population. Eur Spine J. 2009 Sep;18(9):1349–54.
Wang, Shenglin, et al. “Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population.Eur Spine J, vol. 18, no. 9, Sept. 2009, pp. 1349–54. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1112-8.
Wang S, Wang C, Passias PG, Li G, Yan M, Zhou H. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population. Eur Spine J. 2009 Sep;18(9):1349–1354.
Journal cover image

Published In

Eur Spine J

DOI

EISSN

1432-0932

Publication Date

September 2009

Volume

18

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1349 / 1354

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Spinal Cord
  • Spinal Canal
  • Sex Factors
  • Sex Characteristics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Values
  • Orthopedics
  • Occipital Bone
  • Observer Variation