Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Defining Distinct Stress Curve Morphologies for Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Phenotypes Using an Imageless Navigation Robotic Platform in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Holland, CT; Savov, P; Ettinger, M; Seyler, TM
Published in: J Arthroplasty
October 2024

BACKGROUND: The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification system divides coronal knee anatomy into 9 phenotypes, suggesting different soft tissue balancing is needed for optimal outcomes. We investigated the interplay between CPAK phenotypes and gap stress curves throughout the knee's range of motion, aiming to understand their impact on total knee arthroplasty balancing. METHODS: There were 1,112 total knee arthroplasty cases from 2 imageless robotic assisted navigation systems using posterior stabilized implants that were classified into CPAK phenotypes. Medial and lateral initial gap values were measured throughout the knee flexion-extension arc, gap curve morphologies were generated, and mediolateral (ML) gap balance was calculated for each phenotype. The most common phenotypes were included in this study, CPAK I to VI. RESULTS: Each phenotype exhibited a distinct gap curve morphology. Type I maintained the largest ML gap difference (-3.6 to -2.1), with the medial compartment tightest in extension. Type II showed relative laxity in the lateral compartment compared to the medial gap (-1.0 to -1.9), with the medial compartment tightening through flexion. Type III had a looser medial and tighter lateral compartment in extension that inverts to a tighter medial compartment in deep flexion (2.1 to -0.8), while Type IV showed a decreasing compartment difference with increased flexion (-3.7 to 0.6). Type V had fluctuating tightness (-0.6 to 1.8), and Type VI had the medial compartment tightening more with flexion (0.6 to 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct stress curves and ML gap behavior provide a "fingerprint" for each corresponding CPAK phenotype. Investigating these morphologies can help determine the best phenotype-specific treatments, including alignment strategy, implant selection, and gap balance, for optimal functional and patient outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Arthroplasty

DOI

EISSN

1532-8406

Publication Date

October 2024

Volume

39

Issue

10

Start / End Page

2478 / 2482

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Phenotype
  • Orthopedics
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Knee Prosthesis
  • Knee Joint
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Holland, C. T., Savov, P., Ettinger, M., & Seyler, T. M. (2024). Defining Distinct Stress Curve Morphologies for Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Phenotypes Using an Imageless Navigation Robotic Platform in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 39(10), 2478–2482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.011
Holland, Christopher T., Peter Savov, Max Ettinger, and Thorsten M. Seyler. “Defining Distinct Stress Curve Morphologies for Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Phenotypes Using an Imageless Navigation Robotic Platform in Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty 39, no. 10 (October 2024): 2478–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.011.
Holland, Christopher T., et al. “Defining Distinct Stress Curve Morphologies for Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Phenotypes Using an Imageless Navigation Robotic Platform in Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty, vol. 39, no. 10, Oct. 2024, pp. 2478–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.011.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Arthroplasty

DOI

EISSN

1532-8406

Publication Date

October 2024

Volume

39

Issue

10

Start / End Page

2478 / 2482

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Phenotype
  • Orthopedics
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Knee Prosthesis
  • Knee Joint
  • Humans
  • Female