Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”
Publication
, Journal Article
Clemens, MA; Lewis, EG; Postel, HM
Published in: Econ Journal Watch
March 1, 2020
In Clemens, Lewis, and Postel (2018), we evaluate one of the largest active labor market policy interventions of its kind: the federal government decision to bar almost half a million Mexican bracero workers from the U.S. labor market in the 1960s. We—henceforth CLP—found no evidence that this policy intervention raised wages or employment for U.S. workers. Robert Kaestner (2020) likewise presents no evidence that this policy raised wages or employment for U.S. workers. Apparently there is consensus that no such evidence exists. What Kaestner does instead is to state three speculations.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Econ Journal Watch
EISSN
1933-527X
Publication Date
March 1, 2020
Volume
17
Issue
1
Start / End Page
18 / 27
Related Subject Headings
- 3803 Economic theory
- 3802 Econometrics
- 3801 Applied economics
- 14 Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Clemens, M. A., Lewis, E. G., & Postel, H. M. (2020). Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”. Econ Journal Watch, 17(1), 18–27.
Clemens, M. A., E. G. Lewis, and H. M. Postel. “Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”.” Econ Journal Watch 17, no. 1 (March 1, 2020): 18–27.
Clemens MA, Lewis EG, Postel HM. Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”. Econ Journal Watch. 2020 Mar 1;17(1):18–27.
Clemens, M. A., et al. “Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”.” Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 18–27.
Clemens MA, Lewis EG, Postel HM. Comment on Kaestner, “revisiting the bracero guest worker reforms”. Econ Journal Watch. 2020 Mar 1;17(1):18–27.
Published In
Econ Journal Watch
EISSN
1933-527X
Publication Date
March 1, 2020
Volume
17
Issue
1
Start / End Page
18 / 27
Related Subject Headings
- 3803 Economic theory
- 3802 Econometrics
- 3801 Applied economics
- 14 Economics