Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gerling, M; Baker, M; Stanton, E; Pyun, J; Chaladoff, E; Passias, P; Buser, Z
Published in: World Neurosurg
September 2024

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications among minimally invasive surgery (MIS) tubular, endoscopic, and robot-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel TLIF between 2020 and 2022. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale leg score and Oswestry Disability Index), demographic, and intraoperative variables were recorded. One-way analysis of variance with Bartlett's equal-variance and Pearson chi-squared tests were used. RESULTS: The study included 170 TLIF patients: 107 (63%) tubular, 42 (25%) endoscopic, and 21 (12%) robot assisted. All 3 TLIF techniques had similar complication rates: tubular 6 (5.6%), endoscopic 2 (4.8%), and robot assisted 1 (4.8%) all occurring within the first 2 weeks. Tubular TLIF reported the lowest incidence of new-onset neurologic symptoms, primarily radiculitis or numbness/tingling, at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05) with 21 (20%) tubular, 17 (41%) endoscopic, and 9 (43%) robot-assisted patients. There were 2 revisions in the robot-assisted group, while tubular and endoscopic each had one within 1 year. There was no statistical difference in preoperative or postoperative patient-reported outcomes between the TLIF groups. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that tubular, endoscopic, and robot-assisted TLIF procedures had similar complication rates. The tubular MIS TLIF reported fewer new neurologic symptoms compared with endoscopic and robot-assisted TLIF procedures at 2 weeks postoperative, with all groups declining in symptom persistency at later time intervals. Average Visual Analog Scale scores continuously improved up to 1 year postoperatively among all groups.

Duke Scholars

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

September 2024

Volume

189

Start / End Page

e492 / e497

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Spinal Fusion
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Neuroendoscopy
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Incidence
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gerling, M., Baker, M., Stanton, E., Pyun, J., Chaladoff, E., Passias, P., & Buser, Z. (2024). Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures. World Neurosurg, 189, e492–e497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.101
Gerling, Michael, Melissa Baker, Eloise Stanton, Joseph Pyun, Evan Chaladoff, Peter Passias, and Zorica Buser. “Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures.World Neurosurg 189 (September 2024): e492–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.101.
Gerling M, Baker M, Stanton E, Pyun J, Chaladoff E, Passias P, et al. Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures. World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:e492–7.
Gerling, Michael, et al. “Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures.World Neurosurg, vol. 189, Sept. 2024, pp. e492–97. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.101.
Gerling M, Baker M, Stanton E, Pyun J, Chaladoff E, Passias P, Buser Z. Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures. World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;189:e492–e497.
Journal cover image

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

September 2024

Volume

189

Start / End Page

e492 / e497

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Spinal Fusion
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Neuroendoscopy
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Incidence