Skip to main content

Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Nunley, PD; Patel, VV; Orndorff, DG; Lavelle, WF; Block, JE; Geisler, FH
Published in: Clin Interv Aging
2017

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common indication for spine surgery in older adults. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) using a stand-alone spacer that functions as an extension blocker offers a minimally invasive treatment option for intermittent neurogenic claudication associated with spinal stenosis. METHODS: This study evaluated the 5-year clinical outcomes for IPD (Superion®) from a randomized controlled US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noninferiority trial. Outcomes included Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) symptom severity (ss), physical function (pf), and patient satisfaction (ps) subdomains, leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: At 5 years, 84% of patients (74 of 88) demonstrated clinical success on at least two of three ZCQ domains. Individual ZCQ domain success rates were 75% (66 of 88), 81% (71 of 88), and 90% (79 of 88) for ZCQss, ZCQpf, and ZCQps, respectively. Leg and back pain success rates were 80% (68 of 85) and 65% (55 of 85), respectively, and the success rate for ODI was 65% (57 of 88). Percentage improvements over baseline were 42%, 39%, 75%, 66%, and 58% for ZCQss, ZCQpf, leg and back pain VAS, and ODI, respectively (all P<0.001). Within-group effect sizes were classified as very large for four of five clinical outcomes (ie, >1.0; all P<0.0001). Seventy-five percent of IPD patients were free from reoperation, revision, or supplemental fixation at their index level at 5 years. CONCLUSION: After 5 years of follow-up, IPD with a stand-alone spacer provides sustained clinical benefit.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Interv Aging

DOI

EISSN

1178-1998

Publication Date

2017

Volume

12

Start / End Page

1409 / 1417

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Pain Measurement
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nunley, P. D., Patel, V. V., Orndorff, D. G., Lavelle, W. F., Block, J. E., & Geisler, F. H. (2017). Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging, 12, 1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S143503
Nunley, Pierce D., Vikas V. Patel, Douglas G. Orndorff, William F. Lavelle, Jon E. Block, and Fred H. Geisler. “Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Clin Interv Aging 12 (2017): 1409–17. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S143503.
Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1409–17.
Nunley, Pierce D., et al. “Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Clin Interv Aging, vol. 12, 2017, pp. 1409–17. Pubmed, doi:10.2147/CIA.S143503.
Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1409–1417.

Published In

Clin Interv Aging

DOI

EISSN

1178-1998

Publication Date

2017

Volume

12

Start / End Page

1409 / 1417

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Pain Measurement
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female