Skip to main content

Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kim, BI; Wu, KA; Luo, EJ; Morriss, NJ; Cabell, GH; Lentz, TA; Lau, BC
Published in: JSES International
September 1, 2024

Background: The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool is a 10-item multidimensional screening tool utilized to evaluate pain-related psychological traits in individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. The validity of postoperatively collected OSPRO-YF is unclear. This study sought to assess validity of the OSPRO-YF by comparing it to patient-reported outcome scores in both preoperative and postoperative settings. Hypothesis: The authors hypothesized that OSPRO-YF overall score would correlate with shoulder and global function PROs at preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Methods: A review of 101 patients undergoing shoulder surgery by one sports medicine orthopedic surgeon at a large academic institution was conducted. 90 and 54 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome responses. OSPRO-YF, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Evaluation Form, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) were routinely administered before and after surgery at the senior author's clinic visits. Concurrent validity of OSPRO-YF at either timepoint was assessed by comparing scores with PROs cross-sectionally using Pearson correlations and multiple comparison corrections. Results: Preoperatively, higher OSPRO-YF total score was associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P = .05) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P < .01). Higher postoperative OSPRO-YF was also associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P < .01) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P = .01). ASES had strong correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Pain scores at both preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was not significantly associated with OSPRO-YF total score or number of yellow flags at either timepoints. Conclusion: The study findings support the clinical validity of the 10-item OSPRO-YF tool when administered before or after shoulder surgery. For patients exhibiting suboptimal recovery or those identified as high risk at initial screening, assessment of pain-related psychological distress postoperatively may be particularly beneficial in guiding rehabilitation.

Duke Scholars

Published In

JSES International

DOI

EISSN

2666-6383

Publication Date

September 1, 2024

Volume

8

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1115 / 1121

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kim, B. I., Wu, K. A., Luo, E. J., Morriss, N. J., Cabell, G. H., Lentz, T. A., & Lau, B. C. (2024). Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. JSES International, 8(5), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.014
Kim, B. I., K. A. Wu, E. J. Luo, N. J. Morriss, G. H. Cabell, T. A. Lentz, and B. C. Lau. “Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.” JSES International 8, no. 5 (September 1, 2024): 1115–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.014.
Kim, B. I., et al. “Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.” JSES International, vol. 8, no. 5, Sept. 2024, pp. 1115–21. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.014.

Published In

JSES International

DOI

EISSN

2666-6383

Publication Date

September 1, 2024

Volume

8

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1115 / 1121

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences