Skip to main content

Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sattah, NG; D'Anniballe, V; Le, HT; Le, LT; Le, TN; Vu, TT; Louangpradith, V; Lee, WT
Published in: PLoS One
2024

BACKGROUND: There is an increase in human subject research in developing countries and conducting them in an ethical manner depends on the research ethics oversight in these countries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operational, financial, and educational characteristics of research ethics committees (RECs) at institutions in Vietnam and Laos. METHODS: A validated self-assessment tool designed to assess nine major characteristics of RECs was translated into Vietnamese and Laotian. The translated surveys were delivered to and completed by representatives from RECs at institutions in Vietnam and Laos. The surveys were collected, translated back into English, and scored. The data was analyzed to identify potential areas of strength and areas for improvement. RESULTS: The mean survey score for the 19 RECs surveyed was 165.3 out of a maximum of 200 points with a standard deviation of 22.9. Committees scored the highest in the review of specific protocol items (95.6%), submission arrangements and materials (89.5%), and the policies referring to review procedures (85.6%) domains. RECs scored the lowest in the resources domain (65.5%), with only 26.3% of committees having an annual budget. Nearly all RECs have standard operating procedures (94.7%) and policies for disclosing conflicts of interest (89.5%). Most committees use prior ethics training as a criterion to select REC chairs (78.9%) and members (73.7%), with the majority of committees requiring a training course in ethics (76.5%). 68.4% of committees have continuing education in ethics for members and only 42.1% of committees have a budget for member training. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that RECs in Vietnam and Laos have strong foundational review processes for research protocols. Important areas of improvement include improved institutional oversight, financial and administrative resources, and the continued ethics education for current committee members.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2024

Volume

19

Issue

8

Start / End Page

e0309084

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vietnam
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Self-Assessment
  • Laos
  • Humans
  • General Science & Technology
  • Ethics Committees, Research
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sattah, N. G., D’Anniballe, V., Le, H. T., Le, L. T., Le, T. N., Vu, T. T., … Lee, W. T. (2024). Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool. PLoS One, 19(8), e0309084. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309084
Sattah, Nathan Gabriel, Vincent D’Anniballe, Hoang Tu Le, Luyen Thi Le, Thanh Ngoc Le, Thom Thi Vu, Viengsakhone Louangpradith, and Walter T. Lee. “Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool.PLoS One 19, no. 8 (2024): e0309084. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309084.
Sattah NG, D’Anniballe V, Le HT, Le LT, Le TN, Vu TT, et al. Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309084.
Sattah, Nathan Gabriel, et al. “Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool.PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 8, 2024, p. e0309084. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309084.
Sattah NG, D’Anniballe V, Le HT, Le LT, Le TN, Vu TT, Louangpradith V, Lee WT. Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309084.

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2024

Volume

19

Issue

8

Start / End Page

e0309084

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vietnam
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Self-Assessment
  • Laos
  • Humans
  • General Science & Technology
  • Ethics Committees, Research