Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management

Publication ,  Journal Article
Martin, IM; Steelman, TA
Published in: Policy Sciences
March 1, 2004

The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) directs agencies to determine their objectives based on what stakeholders value. Identifying, measuring and analyzing values and objectives is a key challenge for public land management agencies. Using R and Q factor analysis we assess the values and objectives within the Leadership Team (LT) of the United States Forest Service (USFS). R-factor analysis demonstrates strong support among the LT for a more preservation-oriented view to manage public lands. Q-factor analysis reveals divergent perspectives among the LT and how the aggregated preservation orientation found with the R-factor analysis plays out according to individual perspectives. The findings illustrate the challenges inherent in identifying what values and objectives exist, how they should be analyzed, and the implications for choosing one set of values and objectives over another in public lands management to fulfill the mandates under GPRA. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Policy Sciences

DOI

ISSN

0032-2687

Publication Date

March 1, 2004

Volume

37

Issue

1

Start / End Page

37 / 69

Related Subject Headings

  • General Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
  • 4408 Political science
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 1605 Policy and Administration
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Martin, I. M., & Steelman, T. A. (2004). Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management. Policy Sciences, 37(1), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OLIC.0000035463.79209.52
Martin, I. M., and T. A. Steelman. “Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management.” Policy Sciences 37, no. 1 (March 1, 2004): 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OLIC.0000035463.79209.52.
Martin IM, Steelman TA. Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management. Policy Sciences. 2004 Mar 1;37(1):37–69.
Martin, I. M., and T. A. Steelman. “Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management.” Policy Sciences, vol. 37, no. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 37–69. Scopus, doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000035463.79209.52.
Martin IM, Steelman TA. Using multiple methods to understand agency values and objectives: Lessons for public lands management. Policy Sciences. 2004 Mar 1;37(1):37–69.
Journal cover image

Published In

Policy Sciences

DOI

ISSN

0032-2687

Publication Date

March 1, 2004

Volume

37

Issue

1

Start / End Page

37 / 69

Related Subject Headings

  • General Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
  • 4408 Political science
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 1605 Policy and Administration