Calculation of polarization
Publication
, Journal Article
Boyer, LL; Mehl, MJ; Stokes, HT
Published in: Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
September 1, 2002
It has been argued that a recent advance in the theory of polarization implies that Clausius-Mossotti type models of polarization, which express polarization in terms of the dipole moments of overlapping atomiclike densities, are fundamentally flawed. Here we show the argument is unjustified.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
ISSN
0163-1829
Publication Date
September 1, 2002
Volume
66
Issue
9
Start / End Page
921061 / 921063
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Boyer, L. L., Mehl, M. J., & Stokes, H. T. (2002). Calculation of polarization. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 66(9), 921061–921063.
Boyer, L. L., M. J. Mehl, and H. T. Stokes. “Calculation of polarization.” Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 66, no. 9 (September 1, 2002): 921061–63.
Boyer LL, Mehl MJ, Stokes HT. Calculation of polarization. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2002 Sep 1;66(9):921061–3.
Boyer, L. L., et al. “Calculation of polarization.” Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 66, no. 9, Sept. 2002, pp. 921061–63.
Boyer LL, Mehl MJ, Stokes HT. Calculation of polarization. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2002 Sep 1;66(9):921061–921063.
Published In
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
ISSN
0163-1829
Publication Date
September 1, 2002
Volume
66
Issue
9
Start / End Page
921061 / 921063