Skip to main content

Fixed-interval and randomized-interval spaced retrieval training seem to have comparable outcomes for improving confrontation naming performance in three persons with aphasia, but the jury is still out

Publication ,  Other
Mahendra, N
Published in: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
September 4, 2008

Duke Scholars

Published In

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

DOI

EISSN

1748-9547

ISSN

1748-9539

Publication Date

September 4, 2008

Volume

2

Issue

1

Start / End Page

6 / 10

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mahendra, N. “Fixed-interval and randomized-interval spaced retrieval training seem to have comparable outcomes for improving confrontation naming performance in three persons with aphasia, but the jury is still out.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, September 4, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530701878472.
Mahendra, N. “Fixed-interval and randomized-interval spaced retrieval training seem to have comparable outcomes for improving confrontation naming performance in three persons with aphasia, but the jury is still out.” Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, vol. 2, no. 1, 4 Sept. 2008, pp. 6–10. Scopus, doi:10.1080/17489530701878472.

Published In

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

DOI

EISSN

1748-9547

ISSN

1748-9539

Publication Date

September 4, 2008

Volume

2

Issue

1

Start / End Page

6 / 10

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences