Skip to main content

Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Radcliffe, BA; Kim, Y; Raffi, J; Ayala-Peacock, DN; Stephens, SJ; Chino, J; Meltsner, S; Craciunescu, O
Published in: J Appl Clin Med Phys
October 9, 2024

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis was completed to investigate the use of a model-based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) AcurosBV, for use in HDR BT treatments for locally advanced cervical cancer treated with tandem and ovoid applicators with interstitial needles. METHODS: A cohort of 32 patients receiving post-EBRT HDR brachytherapy boost with a prescription dose of 5.5 Gy × 5 fractions to the high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) were selected for this study. For standard TG43 dose calculation, applicators were manually digitized on the planning images, while for AcurosBV calculations, solid renderings of Titanium Fletcher Suite Delclos (FSD) applicators included in BrachyVision were matched to those used clinically and Ti needles were manually digitized. The dose was recalculated using Varian's AcurosBV 13.5 and dose-to-medium-in-medium (Dm,m) was reported. EQD2 values for targets and organs at risk were compared between dose calculation formalisms. D90% and D98% values were reported for the high and intermediate-risk CTVs, and D 2 c m 3 ${\mathrm{\ D}}_{{\mathrm{2\ c}}{{\mathrm{m}}}^{\mathrm{3}}}$ values were reported for OARs including bladder, rectum, sigmoid, bowel, and vagina. Due to variability within the patient cohort, the dosimetric impact of AcurosBV was investigated corresponding to planning image modality (CT vs. CBCT), presence of Ti needles, and contrast within vaginal balloons used to stabilize implants. AcurosBV showed lower dosimetric values for all plans compared to TG43. RESULTS: The average ± standard deviation of dosimetric reduction in D90% was 4.33 ± 0.09% for CTVHR and 4.12 ± 0.09% for CTVIR. The reduction to OARs D 2 c m 3 ${\mathrm{\ D}}_{{\mathrm{2\ c}}{{\mathrm{m}}}^{\mathrm{3}}}$ was: 4.99 ± 0.15% for bladder, 7.87 ± 0.16% for rectum, 5.79 ± 0.17% for sigmoid, 6.91 ± 0.14% for bowel, and 4.55 ± 0.14% for vagina. CONCLUSIONS: AcurosBV should be utilized for HDR BT GYN cases, treated with tandem and ovoid applicators, with high degrees of heterogeneity and calculated in tandem with TG43.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Appl Clin Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

1526-9914

Publication Date

October 9, 2024

Start / End Page

e14549

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 3208 Medical physiology
  • 1116 Medical Physiology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Radcliffe, B. A., Kim, Y., Raffi, J., Ayala-Peacock, D. N., Stephens, S. J., Chino, J., … Craciunescu, O. (2024). Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism. J Appl Clin Med Phys, e14549. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14549
Radcliffe, Billie Ann, Yongbok Kim, Julie Raffi, Diandra N. Ayala-Peacock, Sarah J. Stephens, Junzo Chino, Sheridan Meltsner, and Oana Craciunescu. “Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism.J Appl Clin Med Phys, October 9, 2024, e14549. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14549.
Radcliffe BA, Kim Y, Raffi J, Ayala-Peacock DN, Stephens SJ, Chino J, et al. Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Oct 9;e14549.
Radcliffe, Billie Ann, et al. “Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism.J Appl Clin Med Phys, Oct. 2024, p. e14549. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/acm2.14549.
Radcliffe BA, Kim Y, Raffi J, Ayala-Peacock DN, Stephens SJ, Chino J, Meltsner S, Craciunescu O. Retrospective assessment of HDR brachytherapy dose calculation methods in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: AcurosBV vs. AAPM TG43 formalism. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Oct 9;e14549.

Published In

J Appl Clin Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

1526-9914

Publication Date

October 9, 2024

Start / End Page

e14549

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 3208 Medical physiology
  • 1116 Medical Physiology
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences