Skip to main content

The Infinite Conversation: Carl Schmitt on Parliamentarism and Romanticism

Publication ,  Journal Article
Norberg, J
Published in: Telos
2024

The paper examines the conceptual architecture of Carl Schmitt's 1924 work The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Schmitt famously argues that democracy and parliamentarism are distinct, and that democracy does not require parliamentary institutions. Less well known is that Schmitt explores the analogies between parliamentarism and Romanticism. Schmitt sees the former as the dominant nineteenth-century bourgeois political institution and the latter as the dominant nineteenth-century bourgeois aesthetic movement. Both parliamentarism and Romanticism, he also insists, are committed to forms of “infinite conversation” in which mediation and reconciliation are prioritized over conclusive decision making. For Schmitt, parliamentarism and Romanticism are parallel manifestations of the European bourgeoisie in its era of political and cultural supremacy from 1789 to 1848.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Telos

DOI

Publication Date

2024

Volume

204

Start / End Page

27 / 41

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 4408 Political science
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 1606 Political Science
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Norberg, J. (2024). The Infinite Conversation: Carl Schmitt on Parliamentarism and Romanticism. Telos, 204, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.3817/0924208027
Norberg, Jakob. “The Infinite Conversation: Carl Schmitt on Parliamentarism and Romanticism.” Telos 204 (2024): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.3817/0924208027.
Norberg, Jakob. “The Infinite Conversation: Carl Schmitt on Parliamentarism and Romanticism.” Telos, vol. 204, 2024, pp. 27–41. Manual, doi:10.3817/0924208027.

Published In

Telos

DOI

Publication Date

2024

Volume

204

Start / End Page

27 / 41

Related Subject Headings

  • 5003 Philosophy
  • 4408 Political science
  • 2203 Philosophy
  • 1606 Political Science