Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Murphy, DLK; Koponen, LM; Wood, E; Li, Y; Bukhari-Parlakturk, N; Goetz, SM; Peterchev, AV
Published in: Brain Stimul
October 10, 2024

BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic forces in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a loud clicking sound that produces confounding auditory activation and is potentially hazardous to hearing. To reduce this noise while maintaining stimulation efficiency similar to conventional TMS coils, we previously developed a quiet TMS double containment coil (qTMS-DCC). OBJECTIVE: To compare the stimulation strength, perceived loudness, and EEG response between qTMS-DCC and a commercial TMS coil. METHODS: Nine healthy volunteers participated in a within-subject study design. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) for qTMS-DCC and MagVenture Cool-B65 were measured. Psychoacoustic titration matched the Cool-B65 loudness to qTMS-DCC pulsed at 80, 100, and 120 % RMT. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for both coils. The psychoacoustic titration and ERPs were acquired with the coils both on and 6 cm off the scalp, the latter isolating the effects of airborne auditory stimulation from body sound and electromagnetic stimulation. The ERP comparisons focused on a centro-frontal region that encompassed peak responses in the global signal while stimulating the primary motor cortex. RESULTS: RMT did not differ significantly between the coils, with or without the EEG cap on the head. qTMS-DCC was perceived to be substantially quieter than Cool-B65. For example, qTMS-DCC at 100 % coil-specific RMT sounded like Cool-B65 at 34 % RMT. The general ERP waveform and topography were similar between the two coils, as were early-latency components, indicating comparable electromagnetic brain stimulation in the on-scalp condition. qTMS- DCC had a significantly smaller P180 component in both on-scalp and off-scalp conditions, supporting reduced auditory activation. CONCLUSIONS: The stimulation efficiency of qTMS-DCC matched Cool-B65 while having substantially lower perceived loudness and auditory-evoked potentials.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

October 10, 2024

Volume

17

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1197 / 1207

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Murphy, D. L. K., Koponen, L. M., Wood, E., Li, Y., Bukhari-Parlakturk, N., Goetz, S. M., & Peterchev, A. V. (2024). Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil. Brain Stimul, 17(6), 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.003
Murphy, David L. K., Lari M. Koponen, Eleanor Wood, Yiru Li, Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk, Stefan M. Goetz, and Angel V. Peterchev. “Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil.Brain Stimul 17, no. 6 (October 10, 2024): 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.003.
Murphy DLK, Koponen LM, Wood E, Li Y, Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Goetz SM, et al. Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil. Brain Stimul. 2024 Oct 10;17(6):1197–207.
Murphy, David L. K., et al. “Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil.Brain Stimul, vol. 17, no. 6, Oct. 2024, pp. 1197–207. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.003.
Murphy DLK, Koponen LM, Wood E, Li Y, Bukhari-Parlakturk N, Goetz SM, Peterchev AV. Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil. Brain Stimul. 2024 Oct 10;17(6):1197–1207.
Journal cover image

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

October 10, 2024

Volume

17

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1197 / 1207

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences