Safety and efficacy of outpatient versus inpatient adult brachial plexus surgery.

PURPOSE: Outpatient orthopedic surgery is becoming more common as a method of providing safe and cost-effective medical care. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between adult patients undergoing outpatient versus inpatient brachial plexus surgery. METHODS: A single institution database was queried for patients with brachial plexus injuries undergoing brachial plexus exploration with or without concomitant reconstructive procedures from 2010 to 2022. Outcome measures included 90-day major and minor complications, as well as longer term pain scores and reoperation rates. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the cohorts. RESULTS: In a group of 51 adult patients, 36 (70.6 %) were admitted for at least one night following surgery and 15 (29.4 %) underwent outpatient surgery. The cohorts were similar with respect to demographics. When compared to brachial plexus procedures performed between 2010 and 2016, those performed between 2017 and 2022 were 67 % more likely to be outpatient (OR 0.33; p = 0.11). The overall major complication rate during the 90-day episode of care was 11.8 % (n = 6), all of which occurred in the inpatient cohort. There was no significant difference in minor complication rate. 90-day reoperation rate due to complications was 2.8 % in the inpatient cohort and 0.0 % in the outpatient cohort. CONCLUSION: No prior study has assessed the safety of brachial plexus exploration and reconstruction in an outpatient setting. This study demonstrates that outpatient brachial plexus surgery is a safe option for properly selected patients. Procedures were more often performed outpatient in recent years, reflecting a continuing evolution of our practice.

Duke Scholars

Author Eliana Saltzman Orthopaedic Surgery