Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dziura, J; Gilstad-Hayden, K; Coffman, CJ; Long, CR; Yu, Q; Buta, E; Coggeshall, S; Geda, M; Peduzzi, P; Kyriakides, TC
Published in: Pain Med
November 1, 2024

OBJECTIVE: Most pragmatic trials follow the PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) criteria. The criteria specify unobtrusive measurement of participants' protocol adherence and practitioners' intervention fidelity but suggest no special monitoring strategies to assure trial integrity. We present experience with adherence/fidelity monitoring in the Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC) and provide recommendations for their monitoring in pragmatic trials to preserve inferences of treatment comparisons. METHODS: In November 2021, we surveyed 10 of 11 originally funded PMC pragmatic trials to determine the extent to which adherence and fidelity data were being monitored. RESULTS: Of the 10 PMC trials, 8 track adherence/fidelity. The electronic health record is the most frequent source for monitoring adherence (7/10) and fidelity (5/10). Most adherence data are used to monitor participant engagement with the trial intervention (4/10) and are reviewed by study teams (8/10) and often with a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) (5/10). Half of the trials (5/10) reported using fidelity data for feedback/training; such data are not shared with a DSMB (0/10). Only 2 of 10 trials reported having prespecified guidance or rules around adherence/fidelity (eg, stopping rules or thresholds for corrective action, such as retraining). CONCLUSIONS: As a best practice for pragmatic trials, we recommend early and regular adherence/fidelity monitoring to determine whether intervention delivery is as intended. We propose a 2-stage process with thresholds for intervening and triggers for conducting a formal futility analysis if adherence and fidelity are not maintained. The level of monitoring should be unobtrusive for both participants and those delivering the intervention; resulting data should be reviewed by an independent DSMB.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

November 1, 2024

Volume

25

Issue

Supplement_1

Start / End Page

S41 / S48

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Pain Management
  • Humans
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Anesthesiology
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dziura, J., Gilstad-Hayden, K., Coffman, C. J., Long, C. R., Yu, Q., Buta, E., … Kyriakides, T. C. (2024). Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory. Pain Med, 25(Supplement_1), S41–S48. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae080
Dziura, James, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden, Cynthia J. Coffman, Cynthia R. Long, Qilu Yu, Eugenia Buta, Scott Coggeshall, Mary Geda, Peter Peduzzi, and Tassos C. Kyriakides. “Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory.Pain Med 25, no. Supplement_1 (November 1, 2024): S41–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae080.
Dziura J, Gilstad-Hayden K, Coffman CJ, Long CR, Yu Q, Buta E, et al. Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory. Pain Med. 2024 Nov 1;25(Supplement_1):S41–8.
Dziura, James, et al. “Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory.Pain Med, vol. 25, no. Supplement_1, Nov. 2024, pp. S41–48. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/pm/pnae080.
Dziura J, Gilstad-Hayden K, Coffman CJ, Long CR, Yu Q, Buta E, Coggeshall S, Geda M, Peduzzi P, Kyriakides TC. Recommendations for monitoring adherence and fidelity in pragmatic trials based on experience in the Pain Management Collaboratory. Pain Med. 2024 Nov 1;25(Supplement_1):S41–S48.
Journal cover image

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

November 1, 2024

Volume

25

Issue

Supplement_1

Start / End Page

S41 / S48

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Pain Management
  • Humans
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Anesthesiology
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences