Skip to main content

Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fudim, M; Kittipibul, V; Swavely, A; Gray, A; Mikitka, J; Young, E; Dobbin, O; Radzom, M; Fee, J; Molinger, J; Patterson, B; Badano, LP ...
Published in: Circ Heart Fail
December 2024

BACKGROUND: Invasive exercise right heart catheterization is a gold standard in diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Body positions during the test influence hemodynamics. However, the discrepancy in HFpEF diagnosis between exercise testing in supine versus upright position is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a 2-center prospective study enrolling patients referred for exercise right heart catheterization for HFpEF. We performed a Supright protocol integrating submaximal supine bicycle ergometry (20 W) followed by maximal upright bicycle ergometry with a breath-by-breath oxygen analyzer. HFpEF hemodynamic criteria specific to testing positions were applied. Patients were considered to have concordant HFpEF if they met criteria in both positions or discordant HFpEF if they met criteria only in the supine position. RESULTS: Of 36 patients who met HFpEF criteria in supine position, 18 (50%) did not meet criteria in upright position (discordant HFpEF). Discordant HFpEF had less atrial fibrillation (0% versus 55%; P<0.001), lower left atrial volume (60±14 versus 77±21 mL; P=0.010), and lower H2FPEF score (2.1±1.3 versus 5.1±2.3; P<0.001). In supine position, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure was lower in discordant HFpEF at rest (15±4 versus 19±7 mm Hg; P=0.040). In upright position, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure was lower in discordant HFpEF both at rest (8±4 versus 14±6 mm Hg; P=0.002) and at peak exercise (14±4 versus 27±7 mm Hg; P<0.001). Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure/cardiac output slope was lower in discordant HFpEF (1.6±1.7 versus 3.6±2.9; P<0.001). Maximal workload (46±18 versus 49±24 W; P=0.59) or peak oxygen consumption (11.4±2.8 versus 12.9±3.4 mL/[kg·min]; P=0.15) was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Half of patients who met HFpEF criteria in the supine position did not meet the criteria in the upright position. Patients with a discordant HFpEF phenotype had less structural and hemodynamic abnormalities compared with those with concordant HFpEF. A Supright exercise right heart catheterization approach is feasible and merits further investigation to determine the clinical implications of discordant exercise hemodynamic findings in supine and upright positions.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Circ Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1941-3297

Publication Date

December 2024

Volume

17

Issue

12

Start / End Page

e012020

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Supine Position
  • Stroke Volume
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hemodynamics
  • Heart Failure
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fudim, M., Kittipibul, V., Swavely, A., Gray, A., Mikitka, J., Young, E., … Caravita, S. (2024). Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing. Circ Heart Fail, 17(12), e012020. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012020
Fudim, Marat, Veraprapas Kittipibul, Ashley Swavely, Anna Gray, Jeffrey Mikitka, Erin Young, Olivia Dobbin, et al. “Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing.Circ Heart Fail 17, no. 12 (December 2024): e012020. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012020.
Fudim M, Kittipibul V, Swavely A, Gray A, Mikitka J, Young E, et al. Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing. Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;17(12):e012020.
Fudim, Marat, et al. “Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing.Circ Heart Fail, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2024, p. e012020. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012020.
Fudim M, Kittipibul V, Swavely A, Gray A, Mikitka J, Young E, Dobbin O, Radzom M, Fee J, Molinger J, Patterson B, Battista Perego G, Badano LP, Parati G, Vachiéry J-L, Senni M, Lanzarone E, Previdi F, Paleari S, Baratto C, Caravita S. Discrepancy in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Between Supine Versus Upright Exercise Hemodynamic Testing. Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;17(12):e012020.

Published In

Circ Heart Fail

DOI

EISSN

1941-3297

Publication Date

December 2024

Volume

17

Issue

12

Start / End Page

e012020

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Supine Position
  • Stroke Volume
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hemodynamics
  • Heart Failure