Skip to main content

Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schweiger, L; Golden, SE; Sullivan, DR; Ilea, I; Rice, SPM; Melzer, AC; Datta, S; Davis, JM; Slatore, CG
Published in: Mdm Policy and Practice
July 1, 2024

Introduction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandate that clinicians use a shared decision-making interaction to provide information about the harms and benefits of lung cancer screening (LCS). Methods. We enrolled patients from 3 geographically diverse medical centers after a decision-making interaction about undergoing LCS but before receiving a low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan. We performed the primary analysis based on the primary knowledge question, “Which of these conditions do you think that the CT scan screens for?” We used the knowledge summary score in secondary analyses. We evaluated LCS care experience by using validated instruments to measure participant-reported communication quality (Consultation Care Measure), perception of the primary LCS clinician (Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems), and decision conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale). Results. Of the 409 participants, 44% correctly answered the primary LCS knowledge question. Clinician communication quality was rated positively by 93% of participants. Most (93%) participants rated their LCS clinician as good. Only 14% reported decision conflict. Correctly answering the primary LCS knowledge question was associated with higher patient-clinician communication quality scores (b = 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.1, 0.7]; R2 change = 0.03) and higher LCS clinician ratings (b = 0.4; 95% CI [0.0, 0.7]; R2 change = 0.02) but not with decision conflict. In secondary analyses, higher total LCS knowledge score was associated with lower Decisional Conflict Scale scores (b = −2.2; 95% CI [−3.4, −0.9]; R2 change = 0.24), indicating lower decision conflict. Conclusions. After an LCS decision-making interaction, many patients do not retain basic knowledge about LCS but nevertheless had low levels of decision conflict. Primary LCS knowledge may be important but insufficient to ensure high-quality, patient-centered LCS care. Survey of patients with a lung cancer screening (LCS) decision-making interaction. Only 44% of patients correctly answered the knowledge question about LCS. Primary LCS knowledge was not associated with decision conflict. Patient knowledge about LCS may not equate to high-quality patient-centered care.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Mdm Policy and Practice

DOI

EISSN

2381-4683

Publication Date

July 1, 2024

Volume

9

Issue

2

Related Subject Headings

  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 4206 Public health
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schweiger, L., Golden, S. E., Sullivan, D. R., Ilea, I., Rice, S. P. M., Melzer, A. C., … Slatore, C. G. (2024). Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study. Mdm Policy and Practice, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241286884
Schweiger, L., S. E. Golden, D. R. Sullivan, I. Ilea, S. P. M. Rice, A. C. Melzer, S. Datta, J. M. Davis, and C. G. Slatore. “Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study.” Mdm Policy and Practice 9, no. 2 (July 1, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241286884.
Schweiger L, Golden SE, Sullivan DR, Ilea I, Rice SPM, Melzer AC, et al. Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study. Mdm Policy and Practice. 2024 Jul 1;9(2).
Schweiger, L., et al. “Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study.” Mdm Policy and Practice, vol. 9, no. 2, July 2024. Scopus, doi:10.1177/23814683241286884.
Schweiger L, Golden SE, Sullivan DR, Ilea I, Rice SPM, Melzer AC, Datta S, Davis JM, Slatore CG. Is Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge Associated with Patient-Centered Outcomes? A Multi-institutional Cohort Study. Mdm Policy and Practice. 2024 Jul 1;9(2).

Published In

Mdm Policy and Practice

DOI

EISSN

2381-4683

Publication Date

July 1, 2024

Volume

9

Issue

2

Related Subject Headings

  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 4206 Public health