Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in older adults with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Park, DY; Hu, J-R; Frampton, J; Rymer, J; Al Damluji, A; Nanna, MG
Published in: J Am Geriatr Soc
March 2025

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of complete revascularization (CR) versus culprit-only revascularization (COR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have shifted the recommendation for CR from class III to class I in the AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines, but it remains unclear if the benefit of CR over COR extends to older adults, who have greater bleeding risk, comorbidity burden, and complexity of lesions. We performed a meta-analysis to place the results of the previous RCTs in the context of the recently published FIRE trial and the subgroup analysis of the COMPLETE trial in adults ≥75 years old. METHODS: We searched the literature from inception to October 21, 2023. RCTs of CR versus COR in STEMI were selected if it reported results for older adults, defined as either age > 65 years or > 75 years. Integrated hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using random effects models. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were major bleeding and contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). RESULTS: In this meta-analysis of 5 RCTs including 3513 older adults, CR was associated with a lower hazard of MACE than COR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.047). Sensitivity analysis including trials that defined older adults as age > 65 years resulted in a lower hazard of MACE with CR versus COR, but not in trials that defined older adults as age > 75 years. There was no difference in the hazard of major bleeding or CA-AKI between CR and COR. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest meta-analysis to date investigating CR compared with COR in older adults with STEMI, CR was associated with reduced MACE without a concomitant increase in major bleeding or CA-AKI compared with COR. These results can help cardiologists and geriatricians involved in shared decision-making with patients and caregivers when contemplating whether to pursue CR in older adults.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Am Geriatr Soc

DOI

EISSN

1532-5415

Publication Date

March 2025

Volume

73

Issue

3

Start / End Page

874 / 880

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hemorrhage
  • Geriatrics
  • Female
  • Aged, 80 and over
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Park, D. Y., Hu, J.-R., Frampton, J., Rymer, J., Al Damluji, A., & Nanna, M. G. (2025). Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in older adults with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Geriatr Soc, 73(3), 874–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19295
Park, Dae Yong, Jiun-Ruey Hu, Jennifer Frampton, Jennifer Rymer, Abdulla Al Damluji, and Michael G. Nanna. “Complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in older adults with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Am Geriatr Soc 73, no. 3 (March 2025): 874–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19295.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Geriatr Soc

DOI

EISSN

1532-5415

Publication Date

March 2025

Volume

73

Issue

3

Start / End Page

874 / 880

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hemorrhage
  • Geriatrics
  • Female
  • Aged, 80 and over