Skip to main content

Is the YES/NO classification accurate in screening scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals? - A novel validation study utilizing surface electromyography as a surrogate measure in identifying movement asymmetries.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ramiscal, LS; Bolgla, LA; Cook, CE; Magel, JS; Parada, SA; Chong, R
Published in: J Man Manip Ther
April 2025

BACKGROUND: Scapular dyskinesis is a known risk factor for shoulder pain, making it important to screen for prevention. Physical therapists screen scapular dyskinesis by visually comparing asymmetries in scapular movement during overhead reach using the Scapular Dyskinesis Test Yes/No classification (Y/N). Although scapular kinematics has been used to quantify scapular dyskinesis, current measurement techniques are inaccurate. Optimal scapular muscle activity is crucial for normal shoulder function and is measured using surface electromyography (sEMG). Research suggests that impaired scapular muscles can lead to scapular dyskinesis. Despite kinematics being a poor reference standard, there is currently no validated method to identify movement asymmetries using muscle activity as an alternative. We utilized sEMG to establish Y/N's validity. We hypothesized that Y/N is a valid tool using sEMG as a viable surrogate measure for identifying scapular dyskinesis. METHODS: We employed a known-groups (symmetrical vs. asymmetrical shoulders) validity design following the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Seventy-two asymptomatic subjects were evaluated using Y/N as the index test and sEMG as the reference standard. We created a criterion to assign the sEMG as the reference standard to establish the known groups. We calculated the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) using a 2 × 2 table analysis. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy values were Sn = 0.56 (0.37-0.74), Sp = 0.36 (0.08-0.65), PPV = 0.68 (0.49-0.88), NPV = 0.25 (0.04-0.46), LR+ = 0.87 (0.50-1.53), and LR- = 1.22 (0.50-2.97). CONCLUSION: The Y/N's diagnostic accuracy was poor against the sEMG, suggesting clinicians should rely less on Y/N to screen scapular dyskinesis in the asymptomatic population. Our study demonstrated that sEMG might be a suitable alternative as a reference standard in validating methods designed to screen movement asymmetries.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Man Manip Ther

DOI

EISSN

2042-6186

Publication Date

April 2025

Volume

33

Issue

2

Start / End Page

122 / 132

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Shoulder Joint
  • Scapula
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Orthopedics
  • Muscle, Skeletal
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ramiscal, L. S., Bolgla, L. A., Cook, C. E., Magel, J. S., Parada, S. A., & Chong, R. (2025). Is the YES/NO classification accurate in screening scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals? - A novel validation study utilizing surface electromyography as a surrogate measure in identifying movement asymmetries. J Man Manip Ther, 33(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2436402
Ramiscal, Lawrence S., Lori A. Bolgla, Chad E. Cook, John S. Magel, Stephen A. Parada, and Raymond Chong. “Is the YES/NO classification accurate in screening scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals? - A novel validation study utilizing surface electromyography as a surrogate measure in identifying movement asymmetries.J Man Manip Ther 33, no. 2 (April 2025): 122–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2436402.

Published In

J Man Manip Ther

DOI

EISSN

2042-6186

Publication Date

April 2025

Volume

33

Issue

2

Start / End Page

122 / 132

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Shoulder Joint
  • Scapula
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Orthopedics
  • Muscle, Skeletal
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female