Skip to main content

Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants

Publication ,  Journal Article
Louthan, AM; Baumgardner, AW; Ehrlén, J; Dahlgren, JP; Loomis, AK; Morris, WF
Published in: Ecological Monographs
February 1, 2025

All populations are affected by multiple environmental drivers, including climatic drivers such as temperature or precipitation and biotic drivers such as herbivory or mutualisms. The relative response of a population to each driver is critical to prioritizing threat mitigation for conservation and to understanding whether climatic or biotic drivers most strongly affect fitness. However, the importance of different drivers can vary dramatically across species and across populations of the same species. Theory suggests that the response to climatic versus biotic drivers can be affected by both the species' fundamental niche breadth and the latitude of the population at which the response is measured. However, we have few tests of how these two factors affect relative response to drivers separately, let alone tests of how niche breadth and latitude together influence responses. Here, we use a meta-analysis of published studies on population response to climatic and biotic drivers in terrestrial plants, combined with estimates of climatic niche breadth and position within climatic niche derived from herbarium records, to show that species' niche breadth is the primary determinant of response to climatic versus biotic drivers. Namely, we find that response to climatic drivers changes only minimally with increasing niche breadth, while response to biotic drivers increases with niche breadth. We see similar relationships when considering range size instead of niche breadth. Surprisingly, we find no effects of latitude on the relative effect of climatic versus biotic drivers. Our work suggests that populations of species with small and large ranges experience similar extirpation risks due to the negative impacts of climate change. By contrast, populations of species with large (but not small) ranges may be highly susceptible to changes in densities or distributions of interacting species.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ecological Monographs

DOI

EISSN

1557-7015

ISSN

0012-9615

Publication Date

February 1, 2025

Volume

95

Issue

1

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications
  • 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Louthan, A. M., Baumgardner, A. W., Ehrlén, J., Dahlgren, J. P., Loomis, A. K., & Morris, W. F. (2025). Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants. Ecological Monographs, 95(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1640
Louthan, A. M., A. W. Baumgardner, J. Ehrlén, J. P. Dahlgren, A. K. Loomis, and W. F. Morris. “Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants.” Ecological Monographs 95, no. 1 (February 1, 2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1640.
Louthan AM, Baumgardner AW, Ehrlén J, Dahlgren JP, Loomis AK, Morris WF. Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants. Ecological Monographs. 2025 Feb 1;95(1).
Louthan, A. M., et al. “Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants.” Ecological Monographs, vol. 95, no. 1, Feb. 2025. Scopus, doi:10.1002/ecm.1640.
Louthan AM, Baumgardner AW, Ehrlén J, Dahlgren JP, Loomis AK, Morris WF. Climatic versus biotic drivers' effect on fitness varies with range size but not position within range in terrestrial plants. Ecological Monographs. 2025 Feb 1;95(1).

Published In

Ecological Monographs

DOI

EISSN

1557-7015

ISSN

0012-9615

Publication Date

February 1, 2025

Volume

95

Issue

1

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 4102 Ecological applications
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0501 Ecological Applications
  • 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience