Skip to main content

Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability

Publication ,  Journal Article
Johnson, JE; Clarke, G; de Cesar Netto, C; Chrea, B; Anderson, DD
Published in: Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics
October 1, 2024

Background: Primary implant stability is important for successful outcomes after uncemented total ankle replacement (TAR). However, the influence of patient-specific bone density on TAR performance is poorly understood, especially for implants that rely on press-fit for stable primary fixation. Our goal was to evaluate how bone density influences implant-bone interfacial micromotions in 3 press-fit tibial component designs by sampling from a TAR preoperative planning database using finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: FEA was conducted in 4 TAR patients with relatively low-density (n = 2, lowest 10% of a sample including 58 patients) and average-density (n = 2, midrange of sample) bone as assessed from deidentified patient CT scans. Three tibial implant designs were evaluated: a bone-sparing resurfacing implant, a cortex-sparing anterior approach monoblock stemmed implant, and a distal-reaming modular stemmed implant. Implants were inserted into tibia geometries obtained from the CT scans. Press-fit implantation was modeled first, followed by loadings from the stance phase of gait, and the associated micromotions were computed from the FEA output. Results: In general, patients with average-density bone had FEA predicted lower micromotions than patients with low-density bone. FEA suggests that implant fixation features had less influence on micromotions in patients with average-density bone, with peak micromotions ranging from 2 to 23 µm (3.1 ± 1.3 µm average micromotion). For patients with low-density bone, interfacial regions are predicted to experience micromotions exceeding the bony ingrowth threshold of 50 µm only for the resurfacing implant. Conclusion: We investigated the influence of bone density on implant-bone micromotions with varying primary fixation features using FEA. The model predicts that micromotions are less in average-density bone, regardless of implant fixation features. However, both stemmed devices showed lower micromotions in less-dense bone, albeit with the corresponding clinical trade-off of requiring more tibial bone removal. Clinical Relevance: The results presented here implicate the complementary role that local bone density plays in the primary fixation stability of uncemented TAR.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics

DOI

EISSN

2473-0114

Publication Date

October 1, 2024

Volume

9

Issue

4
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Johnson, J. E., Clarke, G., de Cesar Netto, C., Chrea, B., & Anderson, D. D. (2024). Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability. Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241308577
Johnson, J. E., G. Clarke, C. de Cesar Netto, B. Chrea, and D. D. Anderson. “Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability.” Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics 9, no. 4 (October 1, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241308577.
Johnson JE, Clarke G, de Cesar Netto C, Chrea B, Anderson DD. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability. Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics. 2024 Oct 1;9(4).
Johnson, J. E., et al. “Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability.” Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics, vol. 9, no. 4, Oct. 2024. Scopus, doi:10.1177/24730114241308577.
Johnson JE, Clarke G, de Cesar Netto C, Chrea B, Anderson DD. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence that Bone Density and Implant Fixation Features have on Total Ankle Tibial Component Stability. Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics. 2024 Oct 1;9(4).

Published In

Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics

DOI

EISSN

2473-0114

Publication Date

October 1, 2024

Volume

9

Issue

4