Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Daher, M; Aoun, M; Cottrill, EJ; Wang, Z; Hurley, RK; Lavelle, WF; Passias, PG; Diebo, BG; Daniels, AH; Sebaaly, A
Published in: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
March 15, 2025

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool the available data comparing MIS to open surgery for thoracolumbar fractures and provide a more comprehensive assessment of this topic. BACKGROUND: There remains a debate over whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open fixation provides superior outcomes for patients with thoracolumbar fractures. While several randomized controlled trials and prospective studies have compared these two approaches, the published studies are limited by sample size. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases was performed on October 1, 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications, surgery-related parameters, early and late postoperative back pain, and postoperative regional kyphosis. RESULTS: Five RCTs and five prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 584 patients, with 299 in the MIS group and 285 in the open group. MIS patients were shown to have less EBL (MD=-155.86; 95% CI: -217.97 to -93.76, P <0.001), a shorter LOS (MD=-3.34; 95% CI: -4.62 to -2.06, P <0.001), lower pain scores during the early postoperative period (MD=-1.14; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.71, P <0.001), and less regional kyphosis (MD=-5.17; 95% CI: -7.17 to -3.16, P <0.001), even when stratifying by study type. In addition, fluoroscopy time was longer in the MIS group (MD=0.60; 95% CI: 0.21-0.98, P =0.003), although this difference was not seen when looking at RCTs only. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with thoracolumbar fractures, treatment with MIS was associated with decreased EBL, shorter LOS, earlier pain reduction, and less regional kyphosis compared with treatment with open fixation. In addition, higher radiation exposure was seen among patients treated with MIS. While MIS offers several potential benefits, both MIS and open fixation remain safe and reliable options for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

March 15, 2025

Volume

50

Issue

6

Start / End Page

412 / 419

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thoracic Vertebrae
  • Spinal Fractures
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Orthopedics
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Humans
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Daher, M., Aoun, M., Cottrill, E. J., Wang, Z., Hurley, R. K., Lavelle, W. F., … Sebaaly, A. (2025). Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 50(6), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005252
Daher, Mohammad, Marven Aoun, Ethan J. Cottrill, Zhi Wang, Richard K. Hurley, William F. Lavelle, Peter G. Passias, Bassel G. Diebo, Alan H. Daniels, and Amer Sebaaly. “Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 50, no. 6 (March 15, 2025): 412–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005252.
Daher M, Aoun M, Cottrill EJ, Wang Z, Hurley RK, Lavelle WF, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Mar 15;50(6):412–9.
Daher, Mohammad, et al. “Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 50, no. 6, Mar. 2025, pp. 412–19. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005252.
Daher M, Aoun M, Cottrill EJ, Wang Z, Hurley RK, Lavelle WF, Passias PG, Diebo BG, Daniels AH, Sebaaly A. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Mar 15;50(6):412–419.

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

March 15, 2025

Volume

50

Issue

6

Start / End Page

412 / 419

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thoracic Vertebrae
  • Spinal Fractures
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Orthopedics
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Humans
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal