Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Steg, PG; Nicolas, J; Baber, U; Sartori, S; Zhang, Z; Feng, Y; Angiolillo, DJ; Briguori, C; Cohen, DJ; Collier, T; Dangas, G; Dudek, D ...
Published in: Am Heart J
August 2025

BACKGROUND: The TWILIGHT trial showed that, among high-risk patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were event-free at 3 months, ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events. METHODS: This posthoc analysis describes the risk profiles and outcomes of patients enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial. The primary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and the key secondary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke within 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: The proportion of patients (n = 7,119) fulfilling ≤ 3, 4, 5, or ≥ 6 risk factors was 21.5%, 32.7%, 27.4%, and 18.4%, respectively. Troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the most prevalent clinical criterion (64.9%), and multivessel disease (MVD) was the most prevalent angiographic criterion (66.5%). The most frequent intersection of criteria was the combination of troponin-positive ACS, atherosclerotic vascular disease, MVD, left main or proximal anterior descending lesion, and stent length > 30 mm. A stepwise increase in ischemic but not in bleeding risk was noted with an increasing number of high-risk criteria. Compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced bleeding regardless of the number of risk factors (≤ 3-RF: 3.5% vs 5.8%, HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.38-0.93]; 4-RF: 3.7% vs 6.4%, HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.37-0.86]; 5-RF: 3.8% vs 8.6%, HR 0.44, 95% CI [0.29-0.66]; ≥ 6-RF: 5.3% vs 7.9%, HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.44-0.96]; p-interaction = .56) without significantly increasing the ischemic risk (≤ 3-RF: 1.6% vs 2.1%, HR 0.75, 95% CI [0.38-1.50]; 4-RF: 3.5% vs 2.2%, HR 1.58, 95% CI [0.91-2.75]; 5-RF: 4.1% vs 5.0%, HR 0.80, 95% CI [0.51-1.24]; ≥ 6-RF: 6.7% vs 6.9%, HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.67-1.43]; p-interaction = .22). CONCLUSIONS: In the TWILIGHT trial, the high-risk features correlated more strongly with ischemic than with bleeding risk. Nonetheless, the benefits of ticagrelor compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin were consistent, irrespective of the number of high-risk features. These findings are only applicable to patients who are event-free at 3 months after PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02270242.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

August 2025

Volume

286

Start / End Page

97 / 107

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticagrelor
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Steg, P. G., Nicolas, J., Baber, U., Sartori, S., Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., … Mehran, R. (2025). Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial. Am Heart J, 286, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.016
Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Johny Nicolas, Usman Baber, Samantha Sartori, Zhongjie Zhang, Yihan Feng, Dominick J. Angiolillo, et al. “Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial.Am Heart J 286 (August 2025): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.016.
Steg PG, Nicolas J, Baber U, Sartori S, Zhang Z, Feng Y, et al. Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial. Am Heart J. 2025 Aug;286:97–107.
Steg, Philippe Gabriel, et al. “Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial.Am Heart J, vol. 286, Aug. 2025, pp. 97–107. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.016.
Steg PG, Nicolas J, Baber U, Sartori S, Zhang Z, Feng Y, Angiolillo DJ, Briguori C, Cohen DJ, Collier T, Dangas G, Dudek D, Escaned J, Gibson CM, Han Y-L, Huber K, Kastrati A, Kaul U, Marx SO, Kornowski R, Kunadian V, Vogel B, Oliva A, Mehta SR, Moliterno D, Sardella G, Krucoff M, Shlofmitz RA, Sharma S, Pocock S, Mehran R. Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial. Am Heart J. 2025 Aug;286:97–107.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

August 2025

Volume

286

Start / End Page

97 / 107

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticagrelor
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Myocardial Infarction