State Laws on Law Enforcement Custody and Transportation in the Process of Involuntary Civil Commitment.

OBJECTIVE: Involuntary civil commitment statutes codify the process of involuntary admission to a health care facility. Many statutes assign law enforcement to preside over custody and transportation during the commitment process, which can be traumatizing to people taken into custody. States and localities are seeking to develop alternative crisis response approaches that reduce law enforcement involvement. This study aimed to document variations in state laws pertaining to custody and transportation during involuntary civil commitment. METHODS: The research team analyzed statutes (in effect as of March 1, 2024) of 50 states and the District of Columbia governing custody and transportation during involuntary civil commitment. RESULTS: Although every state and the District of Columbia had laws pertaining to responsibility for custody and transportation during involuntary civil commitment, laws varied on the entities that were allowed to transport individuals being considered for involuntary civil commitment and when non-law enforcement transport was permissible. Only seven states barred non-law enforcement transportation under any circumstance: Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, and Wyoming. However, even in the 44 jurisdictions where alternative transportation was permitted, law enforcement often served as the default transporter because of a lack of available alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Laws specifying responsibility for transport of people being considered for involuntary civil commitment vary by state, and the statutory opportunities to implement non-law enforcement transport are plentiful. Research is needed to guide policy making and implementation regarding involuntary civil commitment.

Duke Scholars

Author Marvin Stanley Swartz Psychiatry, Child & Family Mental Health & Community Psychia ...