Well-to-wake cost and emissions assessments for the Western Australia–East Asia green shipping corridor
The maritime sector, responsible for approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, faces mounting pressure to decarbonize. In response, international “green shipping corridor” agreements have emerged as a prospective strategy to stimulate low-carbon shipping through incentives designed to hedge key stakeholders, catalyze new technologies, develop robust supply chains, and assess trade-offs. This study evaluates decarbonization pathways for the recently-proposed green corridor for iron ore shipping between Western Australia (WA) and East Asia (EA). Using comparative techno-economic analysis (TEA) and attributional life-cycle assessment (LCA) consistent with Resolution MEPC.391(81) adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in March 2024, we identify the most promising technical approaches to reduce the well-to-wake (WtW) GHG emissions of the current fossil-powered fleet while maintaining the competitiveness of the WA–EA iron ore corridor. A representative vessel, cargo, and voyage profile, based on the current bulk carrier fleet, is used to compare the total cost of ownership (TCO) and WtW GHG emissions among conventional and alternative options. We consider a 20 PJ/yr-scale deployment (in terms of lower heating value) of alternative energy carriers including “green” hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol fuels synthesized using wind energy and renewable CO
Duke Scholars
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Related Subject Headings
- Energy
- 40 Engineering
- 38 Economics
- 33 Built environment and design
- 14 Economics
- 09 Engineering
Citation
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Related Subject Headings
- Energy
- 40 Engineering
- 38 Economics
- 33 Built environment and design
- 14 Economics
- 09 Engineering