Adult living-donor lobar lung transplant using a small-for-size graft.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the outcomes of adult living-donor lobar lung transplants (LDLLTs) using small-for-size grafts. METHODS: A calculated graft forced vital capacity of <50% of the predicted forced vital capacity of the recipient was considered to indicate a small-for-size graft. Adult recipients (≥18 years) who underwent LDLLTs between 2008 and 2022 were included in this study. RESULTS: We performed 80 adult LDLLTs, using small-for-size grafts in 15 patients and non-small grafts in 65 patients. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction developed within 72 h after the transplant in 3 patients (20%) in the small group and in 3 patients (4.6%) in the non-small group (P = 0.0763). The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 86.7% and 69.3% in the small group and 93.8% and 77.1% in the non-small group (P = 0.742). In the small group, the native lungs were spared in 8 patients, whereas 2 lobar grafts were implanted with non-spared native lungs in the other 7 patients. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were significantly better in the spared group (both 100%) than in the non-spared group (71.4% and 23.8%; P = 0.0375). The spared group showed a significantly higher median percent forced vital capacity after the transplant than the non-spared group (68.5% vs 44.9%; P = 0.0027). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of small-for-size grafts was associated with a higher rate of severe primary graft dysfunction, no differences were found in survival rates. When the graft is small, the native lung should be partially spared if possible.

Duke Scholars

Author Hiroshi Date Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery