Skip to main content

Extraction of Three Mechanistically Different Variability and Noise Sources in the Trial-to-Trial Variability of Brain Stimulation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ma, K; Liu, S; Qin, M; Goetz, SM
Published in: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
2025

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are among the few directly observable responses to external brain stimulation and serve a variety of applications, often in the form of input-output (IO) curves. Previous statistical models with two variability sources inherently consider the small MEPs at the low-side plateau as part of the neural recruitment properties. However, recent studies demonstrated that small MEP responses under resting conditions are contaminated and over-shadowed by background noise of mostly technical quality, e.g., caused by the amplifier, and suggested that the neural recruitment curve should continue below this noise level. This work intends to separate physiological variability from background noise and improve the description of recruitment behaviour. We developed a triple-variability-source model around a logarithmic logistic function without a lower plateau and incorporated an additional source for background noise. Compared to models with two or fewer variability sources, our approach better described IO characteristics, evidenced by lower Bayesian Information Criterion scores across all subjects and pulse shapes. The model independently extracted hidden variability information across the stimulated neural system and isolated it from background noise, which led to an accurate estimation of the IO curve parameters. This new model offers a robust tool to analyse brain stimulation IO curves in clinical and experimental neuroscience and reduces the risk of spurious results from inappropriate statistical methods. The presented model together with the corresponding calibration method provides a more accurate representation of MEP responses and variability sources, advances our understanding of cortical excitability, and may improve the assessment of neuromodulation effects.

Duke Scholars

Published In

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng

DOI

EISSN

1558-0210

Publication Date

2025

Volume

33

Start / End Page

4089 / 4099

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Motor Cortex
  • Models, Statistical
  • Models, Neurological
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ma, K., Liu, S., Qin, M., & Goetz, S. M. (2025). Extraction of Three Mechanistically Different Variability and Noise Sources in the Trial-to-Trial Variability of Brain Stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 33, 4089–4099. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3522681
Ma, Ke, Siwei Liu, Mengjie Qin, and Stephan M. Goetz. “Extraction of Three Mechanistically Different Variability and Noise Sources in the Trial-to-Trial Variability of Brain Stimulation.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 33 (2025): 4089–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3522681.
Ma, Ke, et al. “Extraction of Three Mechanistically Different Variability and Noise Sources in the Trial-to-Trial Variability of Brain Stimulation.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, vol. 33, 2025, pp. 4089–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3522681.

Published In

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng

DOI

EISSN

1558-0210

Publication Date

2025

Volume

33

Start / End Page

4089 / 4099

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Motor Cortex
  • Models, Statistical
  • Models, Neurological
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female