Skip to main content

North Carolina’s Failure to Perform Comparative Proportionality Review: Violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments by Allowing the Arbitrary and Discriminatory Application of the Death Penalty

Publication ,  Journal Article
Emanuel, B
Published in: Review of law and social change. New York University

This article argues that because of the North Carolina Supreme Court’s failure to perform its statutorily mandated comparative proportionality review of all death sentences, North Carolina’s imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The article makes a two-part showing to demonstrate this violation: first, that the state supreme court does not meaningfully perform its statutorily mandated comparative proportionality review, and second, that under current United States Supreme Court precedent, this failure violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. While the U.S. Supreme Court has held that comparative proportionality review is not always necessary for a state’s death penalty statutory scheme to be constitutional, it also made clear that the review would still be required where a state’s capital sentencing system was so lacking in other checks as to allow arbitrariness and discrimination in death sentencing. North Carolina’s is just such a scheme. North Carolina Supreme Court opinions make clear that meaningful proportionality review is a primary mechanism under which the state purports to comply with the constitutional mandate to prevent discriminatory death sentences. More importantly, evidence brought forth by the recent Racial Justice Act cases demonstrates that the state has indeed failed to prevent discriminatory sentences when not following its statute and adequately performing the review. Because comparative proportionality review of all death sentences by the North Carolina Supreme Court is constitutionally required, and because the court fails to adequately perform that review, North Carolina’s imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Review of law and social change. New York University

EISSN

0048-7481

ISSN

0048-7481

Volume

39

Issue

4

Start / End Page

419 / 473

Publisher

New York University School of Law

Related Subject Headings

  • 4807 Public law
  • 4804 Law in context
  • 1801 Law
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Emanuel, Brooks. “North Carolina’s Failure to Perform Comparative Proportionality Review: Violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments by Allowing the Arbitrary and Discriminatory Application of the Death Penalty.” Review of Law and Social Change. New York University, vol. 39, no. 4, New York University School of Law, pp. 419–73.

Published In

Review of law and social change. New York University

EISSN

0048-7481

ISSN

0048-7481

Volume

39

Issue

4

Start / End Page

419 / 473

Publisher

New York University School of Law

Related Subject Headings

  • 4807 Public law
  • 4804 Law in context
  • 1801 Law