Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mauck, MC; Barth, KS; Bell, KM; Brooks, AK; Chadwick, AL; Gunn, CA; Hurley, RW; Ivanova, A; Piva, SR; Schneider, MJ; Bailey, JF; Bagaason, S ...
Published in: Pain Med
September 1, 2025

OBJECTIVE: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a common condition that impacts quality of life and function. There are many evidence-based treatments to address cLBP; however, treatment effects are modest, perhaps in part due to individual variation in treatment response. The Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments (BEST) trial was designed as the collaborative centerpiece of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) research program. This consortium was sponsored by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) as part of the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative. DESIGN: The BEST trial was a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) designed with the primary goal of identifying in whom different treatments show optimal response. The primary focus of the study was to use patient features, including biomarkers and phenotypic measures, to identify subsets of persons with cLBP who respond best to specific common treatments. METHODS: Four interventions were chosen for the trial: Enhanced Self-Care, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Duloxetine, and Evidence-Based Exercise and Manual Therapy. Following a run-in period and baseline assessment, participants were randomized to 1 of the 4 treatments for the first 12-week intervention period. Participants were reassessed and based on their self-reported response to initial treatment, continued that initial treatment, were augmented with an additional randomly assigned treatment, or were switched to a new treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial was designed to deliver rich phenotypic data that will both potentially aid in the discovery of phenotypic characteristics that predict treatment response and provide a greater mechanistic understanding of cLBP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments (BEST) trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT05396014; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05396014).

Duke Scholars

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

September 1, 2025

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

538 / 553

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Duloxetine Hydrochloride
  • Chronic Pain
  • Biomarkers
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mauck, M. C., Barth, K. S., Bell, K. M., Brooks, A. K., Chadwick, A. L., Gunn, C. A., … Sowa, G. A. (2025). The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Pain Med, 26(9), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf032
Mauck, Matthew C., Kelly S. Barth, Kevin M. Bell, Amber K. Brooks, Andrea L. Chadwick, Cameron A. Gunn, Robert W. Hurley, et al. “The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.Pain Med 26, no. 9 (September 1, 2025): 538–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf032.
Mauck MC, Barth KS, Bell KM, Brooks AK, Chadwick AL, Gunn CA, et al. The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Pain Med. 2025 Sep 1;26(9):538–53.
Mauck, Matthew C., et al. “The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.Pain Med, vol. 26, no. 9, Sept. 2025, pp. 538–53. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/pm/pnaf032.
Mauck MC, Barth KS, Bell KM, Brooks AK, Chadwick AL, Gunn CA, Hurley RW, Ivanova A, Piva SR, Schneider MJ, Bailey JF, Bagaason S, Batorsky A, Borckardt JJ, Bowden AE, Carey TS, Castellanos J, Chen L, Chidgey B, Dalton D, Dufour JS, Fields AJ, Fritz JM, Goolsby RW, Greco CM, Harris RE, Harte S, Hassett AL, Hoffmeyer A, Jones Berkeley S, Kaplan C, Kidwell KM, Knapik GG, Kosorok MR, Kurillo G, Lobo R, Lotz JC, Mackey S, Mageswaran P, Majumdar S, Mao J, Marras WS, McCumber M, McLean SA, Mehling W, Mitchell UH, Napadow VJ, O’Neill C, Patel KV, Peltier S, Psioda M, Rowland B, Rundell SD, Schrepf A, Sperger J, Vo N, Wallace MS, Wasan AD, Weaver TE, Weber KA, Williams DA, Wilson L, Zeidan F, Zhao B, Anstrom KJ, Clauw DJ, Sowa GA. The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Pain Med. 2025 Sep 1;26(9):538–553.
Journal cover image

Published In

Pain Med

DOI

EISSN

1526-4637

Publication Date

September 1, 2025

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

538 / 553

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Low Back Pain
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Duloxetine Hydrochloride
  • Chronic Pain
  • Biomarkers