Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Saggar, R; Mullen, J; Mangone, PG; Hogan, MV
Published in: Arthroscopy
May 2025

Achilles tendon ruptures are increasingly prevalent among active adults, requiring careful treatment selection between surgical repair (open or minimally invasive) and nonsurgical management. Surgical treatment reduces rerupture rates (2.3% vs 3.9% with nonsurgical management) and enables a faster return to work (19 days earlier on average) but carries risks such as wound infections (open 6% vs minimally invasive 0.4%), nerve injuries (open 2.8% vs minimally invasive 5.2%), and deep vein thrombosis (1%). Minimally invasive approaches match open repair outcomes with fewer superficial infections (0.4% vs 6%) but higher sural nerve injury risk (3.4% vs 0%). Meta-analyses confirm that surgery significantly reduces rerupture risk (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.60) but increases complication rates (relative risk, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-4.13). Nonsurgical management and early weightbearing protocols have demonstrated comparable functional outcomes compared to surgery in selected patients. The UKSTAR trial (n = 527) validated functional bracing as an effective alternative to plaster casting, with no significant differences in Achilles Tendon Rupture Scores or rerupture rates. Although not significant, cost-effectiveness analysis shows surgical management is costlier overall but lowers indirect costs, likely attributable to faster recovery and return to work. Rehabilitation, particularly early mobilization, is critical for optimizing outcomes in both surgical and nonsurgical groups, with surgical patients demonstrating faster strength recovery (18% greater at 18 months). Modern strategies emphasize patient-centered care, recommending surgery for younger, high-demand patients and nonsurgical options for those with lower functional requirements or comorbidities. Shared decision-making remains essential to aligning treatment with individual patient goals and improving satisfaction.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arthroscopy

DOI

EISSN

1526-3231

Publication Date

May 2025

Volume

41

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1252 / 1254

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tendon Injuries
  • Rupture
  • Orthopedics
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Achilles Tendon
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Saggar, R., Mullen, J., Mangone, P. G., & Hogan, M. V. (2025). Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment. Arthroscopy, 41(5), 1252–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.002
Saggar, Rachit, Joseph Mullen, Peter G. Mangone, and MaCalus V. Hogan. “Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment.Arthroscopy 41, no. 5 (May 2025): 1252–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.002.
Saggar R, Mullen J, Mangone PG, Hogan MV. Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment. Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1252–4.
Saggar, Rachit, et al. “Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment.Arthroscopy, vol. 41, no. 5, May 2025, pp. 1252–54. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.002.
Saggar R, Mullen J, Mangone PG, Hogan MV. Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Treatment. Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1252–1254.
Journal cover image

Published In

Arthroscopy

DOI

EISSN

1526-3231

Publication Date

May 2025

Volume

41

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1252 / 1254

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tendon Injuries
  • Rupture
  • Orthopedics
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Achilles Tendon
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences