Review of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), defined broadly as surgical revascularization via any sternotomy-sparing approach. Here, we provide an overview of minimally invasive CABG targeted to cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and other clinicians involved in the care of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A narrative review of the literature on minimally invasive CABG was performed. RESULTS: Minimally invasive CABG was first described over 20 years ago, yet uptake has been slow and available data are limited. The most common iteration of minimally invasive CABG is a single-vessel CABG (left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery) performed without the cardiopulmonary bypass machine via mini-thoracotomy. However, in patients with multivessel CAD, other options include minimally invasive multivessel CABG and hybrid revascularization (minimally invasive CABG with percutaneous coronary intervention). Patient selection and preoperative planning are paramount. Observational studies and small randomized controlled trials demonstrate that minimally invasive CABG is associated with reduced rates of blood transfusion, surgical site infections, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays, and time to return to full activity with promising late outcomes. Finally, we describe future areas for growth, including ongoing clinical trials, gaps in evidence and pragmatic considerations for surgeons interested in starting a minimally invasive CABG programme. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive CABG can expand the armamentarium of revascularization techniques available for the ageing and increasingly complex population of patients with CAD.

Duke Scholars

Author Brittany Anne Zwischenberger Surgery, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery