Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Rasmussen, LD; Sikjær, M; Søby, JH; Pedersen, OB; Westra, J; Efthekhari, A; Christiansen, EH; Foldyna, B; Williams, MC; Dweck, MR; Newby, DE ...
Published in: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
August 29, 2025

AIMS: To investigate whether the PROMISE Minimal Risk Score (PMRS) enables adjustment of the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood of obstructive CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two cohorts of stable patients with new-onset chest pain were established: a diagnosis cohort (n = 4,298) and a prognosis cohort (n = 14,013). Patients were stratified by the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood model, and patients with low (>5 to 15%) clinical likelihood were further stratified by the PMRS using a ≥ 34% cut-off. For the diagnosis cohort, obstructive CAD was defined invasively by fractional flow reserve ≤0.80. For the prognosis cohort, the primary endpoint was non-fatal myocardial infarction or all-cause death.In the diagnosis cohort, 1,669 (39%) patients had low (>5 to ≤15%) clinical likelihood, of whom 301/1,669 (18%) patients had a PMRS ≥34%. In these patients, the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 14/301 (4.7%), similar to patients with very-low (≤5%) clinical likelihood [64/1,667 (3.8%), p = 0.21]. In the prognosis cohort, 6,187 (44%) patients had low (>5 to ≤15%) clinical likelihood, of whom 993/6,187 (16%) patients had a PMRS ≥34%. In these patients, event rates were similar to patients with very-low (≤5%) clinical likelihood [hazard ratio, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.52), p = 0.77]. Compared to patients with low (>5 to ≤15%) clinical likelihood and a PMRS <34%, the prevalence of obstructive CAD and risk were lower in patients with low (>5 to ≤15%) clinical likelihood and a PMRS ≥34% (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: In patients with low (>5 to ≤15%) clinical likelihood of obstructive CAD, the PMRS enables safe down-classification of 1 in 6 patients to a very-low (≤5%) clinical likelihood category. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02264717, NCT03481712, NCT04707859, NCT01174550 and NCT01149590.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging

DOI

EISSN

2047-2412

Publication Date

August 29, 2025

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1507 / 1517

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Adjustment
  • Prognosis
  • Probability
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Rasmussen, L. D., Sikjær, M., Søby, J. H., Pedersen, O. B., Westra, J., Efthekhari, A., … Winther, S. (2025). Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 26(9), 1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf193
Rasmussen, Laust D., Malene Sikjær, Jacob Hartmann Søby, Oliver Buchhave Pedersen, Jelmer Westra, Ashkan Efthekhari, Evald Høj Christiansen, et al. “Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 26, no. 9 (August 29, 2025): 1507–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf193.
Rasmussen LD, Sikjær M, Søby JH, Pedersen OB, Westra J, Efthekhari A, et al. Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Aug 29;26(9):1507–17.
Rasmussen, Laust D., et al. “Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, vol. 26, no. 9, Aug. 2025, pp. 1507–17. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf193.
Rasmussen LD, Sikjær M, Søby JH, Pedersen OB, Westra J, Efthekhari A, Christiansen EH, Foldyna B, Williams MC, Dweck MR, Newby DE, Douglas PS, Bøttcher M, Winther S. Dual probability approach for risk adjustment in patients with a low clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Aug 29;26(9):1507–1517.
Journal cover image

Published In

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging

DOI

EISSN

2047-2412

Publication Date

August 29, 2025

Volume

26

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1507 / 1517

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Adjustment
  • Prognosis
  • Probability
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial