Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony
Publication
, Journal Article
Garrett, BL; Scurich, N; Faigman, D
Published in: Law and Human Behavior
2025
Duke Scholars
Published In
Law and Human Behavior
Publication Date
2025
Volume
49
Issue
4
Start / End Page
387 / 397
Related Subject Headings
- Young Adult
- Middle Aged
- Maryland
- Male
- Humans
- Forensic Ballistics
- Firearms
- Female
- Criminology
- Adult
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Garrett, B. L., Scurich, N., & Faigman, D. (2025). Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 49(4), 387–397.
Garrett, Brandon L., Nicholas Scurich, and David Faigman. “Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony.” Law and Human Behavior 49, no. 4 (2025): 387–97.
Garrett BL, Scurich N, Faigman D. Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony. Law and Human Behavior. 2025;49(4):387–97.
Garrett, Brandon L., et al. “Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony.” Law and Human Behavior, vol. 49, no. 4, 2025, pp. 387–97.
Garrett BL, Scurich N, Faigman D. Ineffectiveness of the “Consistent with” Judicial Limitation on Forensic Firearm Identification Testimony. Law and Human Behavior. 2025;49(4):387–397.
Published In
Law and Human Behavior
Publication Date
2025
Volume
49
Issue
4
Start / End Page
387 / 397
Related Subject Headings
- Young Adult
- Middle Aged
- Maryland
- Male
- Humans
- Forensic Ballistics
- Firearms
- Female
- Criminology
- Adult