Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Safran, T; Khalaf, R; Metelitsa, A; Woodward, J; Nikolis, A
Published in: Aesthet Surg J
September 16, 2025

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of treatment for adverse events to hyaluronic acid filler is the use of hyaluronidase (HYAL); however, the dose and dilution are not standardized. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine differential dilutions and concentrations of HYAL, and to compare the effectiveness of ovine and human HYAL. METHODS: Fillers were selected for study based on a variety of rheologic factors. A 0.2-mL dose of product was selected for use based on previous studies. Degradation was assessed by comparing both ovine and recombinant HYAL over a range of concentrations and dilutions. RESULTS: In the 2:1 dilution group, Restylane Lidocaine (Galderma, Lausanne, Switzerland) was degraded by 100 U of ovine HYAL after 50 minutes. No other filler was completely degraded; Restylane Lyft (Galderma) was partially degraded after 1 hour of treatment with 100 U of HYAL. In both the 3:1 and 4:1 dilution groups, Restylane Shaype (Galderma) and Restylane Lyft fillers were most susceptible to degradation, dissolving within 30 minutes with 100 U of recombinant HYAL and within 40 minutes with 100 U of ovine HYAL. Juvéderm and RHA4 fillers were the most resistant, requiring 300 U of HYAL for degradation within 1 hour. Beyond a 3:1 dilution ratio, no further improvement was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that 300 U of hyaluronidase is sufficient to degrade 0.2 mL of the most resistant hyaluronic acid fillers within 1 hour. Importantly, a minimum dilution of 3:1 should be used to provide adequate fluid for dissolving filler. Ovine HYAL appears to be just as effective as recombinant HYAL in terms of dissolving product.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Aesthet Surg J

DOI

EISSN

1527-330X

Publication Date

September 16, 2025

Volume

45

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1086 / 1093

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Sheep
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Lidocaine
  • Hyaluronoglucosaminidase
  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Humans
  • Dermal Fillers
  • Cosmetic Techniques
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Safran, T., Khalaf, R., Metelitsa, A., Woodward, J., & Nikolis, A. (2025). Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase. Aesthet Surg J, 45(10), 1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf127
Safran, Tyler, Roy Khalaf, Andrei Metelitsa, Julie Woodward, and Andreas Nikolis. “Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase.Aesthet Surg J 45, no. 10 (September 16, 2025): 1086–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf127.
Safran T, Khalaf R, Metelitsa A, Woodward J, Nikolis A. Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase. Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Sep 16;45(10):1086–93.
Safran, Tyler, et al. “Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase.Aesthet Surg J, vol. 45, no. 10, Sept. 2025, pp. 1086–93. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/asj/sjaf127.
Safran T, Khalaf R, Metelitsa A, Woodward J, Nikolis A. Comparison of the Degradability of Hyaluronic Acid by Ovine and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase. Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Sep 16;45(10):1086–1093.
Journal cover image

Published In

Aesthet Surg J

DOI

EISSN

1527-330X

Publication Date

September 16, 2025

Volume

45

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1086 / 1093

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Sheep
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Lidocaine
  • Hyaluronoglucosaminidase
  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Humans
  • Dermal Fillers
  • Cosmetic Techniques
  • Animals