Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Publication ,  Journal Article
Daher, M; Aoun, M; Cottrill, EJ; Hurley, RK; Lavelle, WF; Passias, PG; Diebo, BG; Daniels, AH; Sebaaly, A
Published in: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
January 1, 2025

Background:Surgical management of thoracolumbar fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis remains debated. Although several studies have compared minimally invasive surgery to open fixation of thoracolumbar fractures in this patient population, a meta-analysis compiling the literature on this topic is lacking.Methods:Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1 to 20) were accessed and explored until October 2024. The extracted data consisted of complications, mortality, surgery-related parameters, postoperative back pain, and postoperative Cobb angle. Across all studies, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were used for continuous data, whereas odds ratio was used for dichotomous data.Results:Eight retrospective articles were included in the meta-analysis, including 295 patients, with 164 in the MIS group and 131 in the open group. Patients undergoing minimally invasive fixation were found to have lower rates of overall complications (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75, P = 0.003), shorter surgical time (MD = -67.79; 95% CI, -91.61 to -43.96, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (MD = -14.08; 95% CI, -25.95 to -2.21, P = 0.02), and less blood loss (MD = -1.52; 95% CI, -2.70 to -0.33, P = 0.01). However, there was no difference in postoperative back pain or Cobb angle between the two groups.Conclusion:Patients undergoing MIS treatment of fractures through ankylosed spines had lower rates of complications, less EBL, and shorter surgical time and LOS, highlighting the potential benefits of minimally invasive fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. However, studies with longer-term follow-up to assess the longevity of MIS fixation are needed, and furthermore some injury patterns may not be amenable to MIS fixation. Also, some institutions may not have resources to provide MIS techniques, and open fixation remains a safe and reliable option for treatment.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

DOI

ISSN

1067-151X

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Daher, M., Aoun, M., Cottrill, E. J., Hurley, R. K., Lavelle, W. F., Passias, P. G., … Sebaaly, A. (2025). Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01277
Daher, M., M. Aoun, E. J. Cottrill, R. K. Hurley, W. F. Lavelle, P. G. Passias, B. G. Diebo, A. H. Daniels, and A. Sebaaly. “Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, January 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01277.
Daher M, Aoun M, Cottrill EJ, Hurley RK, Lavelle WF, Passias PG, et al. Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025 Jan 1;
Daher, M., et al. “Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Jan. 2025. Scopus, doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01277.
Daher M, Aoun M, Cottrill EJ, Hurley RK, Lavelle WF, Passias PG, Diebo BG, Daniels AH, Sebaaly A. Minimally Invasive vs Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients With Ankylosing Spinal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025 Jan 1;

Published In

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

DOI

ISSN

1067-151X

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences