Skip to main content
Mechanical Circulatory Support

Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition

Publication ,  Chapter
Bishawi, M; Schroder, J
January 1, 2025

General and patient-specific factors are involved in selecting the type of temporary mechanical support for patients in cardiogenic shock. The type of support largely depends on the shock’s etiology and the presence of counterindications to specific strategies. The transition to durable support requires a careful evaluation of the patient’s candidacy, the transition’s timing, and the level of support required. As device therapies continue to improve, a team-based approach of different cardiogenic shock specialists will lead to improved decision-making in this complex patient population.

Duke Scholars

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Start / End Page

323 / 332
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bishawi, M., & Schroder, J. (2025). Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. In Mechanical Circulatory Support (pp. 323–332). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25
Bishawi, M., and J. Schroder. “Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition.” In Mechanical Circulatory Support, 323–32, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25.
Bishawi M, Schroder J. Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. In: Mechanical Circulatory Support. 2025. p. 323–32.
Bishawi, M., and J. Schroder. “Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition.” Mechanical Circulatory Support, 2025, pp. 323–32. Scopus, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25.
Bishawi M, Schroder J. Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. Mechanical Circulatory Support. 2025. p. 323–332.

DOI

Publication Date

January 1, 2025

Start / End Page

323 / 332