Mechanical Circulatory Support
Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition
Publication
, Chapter
Bishawi, M; Schroder, J
January 1, 2025
General and patient-specific factors are involved in selecting the type of temporary mechanical support for patients in cardiogenic shock. The type of support largely depends on the shock’s etiology and the presence of counterindications to specific strategies. The transition to durable support requires a careful evaluation of the patient’s candidacy, the transition’s timing, and the level of support required. As device therapies continue to improve, a team-based approach of different cardiogenic shock specialists will lead to improved decision-making in this complex patient population.
Duke Scholars
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bishawi, M., & Schroder, J. (2025). Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. In Mechanical Circulatory Support (pp. 323–332). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25
Bishawi, M., and J. Schroder. “Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition.” In Mechanical Circulatory Support, 323–32, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25.
Bishawi M, Schroder J. Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. In: Mechanical Circulatory Support. 2025. p. 323–32.
Bishawi, M., and J. Schroder. “Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition.” Mechanical Circulatory Support, 2025, pp. 323–32. Scopus, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09048-6_25.
Bishawi M, Schroder J. Choosing Short- Versus Long-Term Mechanical Support and When to Transition. Mechanical Circulatory Support. 2025. p. 323–332.